| Revision as of 05:17, 6 September 2007 editChaser renamer (talk | contribs)396 editsm clean up from rename using AWB← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:53, 12 September 2007 edit undoChaser (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users22,935 edits →Voting: clearNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| ===Voting=== | ===Voting=== | ||
| *'']'' | |||
| **I'd forgotten about this case, but now I remember hearing about the court's fascinating reasoning.--] ] 15:48, 4 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| **<s>Since MZM suggested it, I'll register a vote for him (her) as well, though these tend just to be pile-ons.</s>--] ] 15:48, 4 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| **Making it an official vote. --] 20:43, 4 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Wikipedians involved== | ==Wikipedians involved== | ||
Revision as of 18:53, 12 September 2007
The United States Supreme Court Case Article Improvement Project Project Collaboration Article is an article chosen by members of the Project who wish to participate. The object of the collaboration is to improve the article to the level of a featured article on the Misplaced Pages Main Page.
Next PCA
Nominations
Voting for the next PCA may begin at any time. The following articles have been nominated:
- Marbury v. Madison - established judicial review
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld - government's ability to detain unlawful combatants
- Webster v. Reproductive Health Services abortion regulation
- United States v. Carolene Products Co. Footnote four started modern levels of judicial scrutiny
- Prize Cases presidential power in wartime
- While I can't think of any off the top of my head, I'm proposing a case that, unlike the ones above, doesn't have very much substance to it at all, yet it has had a powerful effect on law. That way, everyone could get involved and work to build it from nothing.
- Category:U.S._Supreme_Court_stubs is full of short articles (and a few that no longer deserve the stub designation).
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, extremely short right now, yet an interesting case involving free speech
- Bush v. Gore - controversial case indirectly deciding 2000 U.S. Presidential Election
- Gonzales v. Carhart - Case upholding the federal Partial Birth Abortion Ban of 2003.
- Loving v. Virginia state laws banning interracial marriage uconstitutional
Voting
Wikipedians involved
Article sections
The sections as outlined by the Project are listed below. As sections are completed by Wikipedians, they should be crossed off to show that they are done.
- Introduction
- Prior history
- The case
- Effects
- Subsequent history
- Sources and further reading
- External links
- Categories
- Interlanguage links (if possible)
For an explanation of the type of information that should be included in each section, please see Misplaced Pages:WikiProject US Supreme Court Cases#Guidelines and article outline.
Votes for closure
This section is to be used once an article has reached the point of being completed and every section above is crossed off. All Wikipedians involved must register their vote to close a collaboration. When the every member involved agrees that the article is complete to both Project and featured article standards, the article will be submitted as a nomination for featured article. Until every member involved in the particular collaboration agrees that the article is complete, it will continue to be worked on.
- Hasn't gotten much work in the last few weeks after a ton of work by Axios023. Close?--Chaser T 23:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)