| Revision as of 23:55, 6 September 2007 editEpbr123 (talk | contribs)291,700 editsm →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:19, 9 September 2007 edit undoUnknownMan~enwiki (talk | contribs)506 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| :'''Delete''' I'm not convinced that she is prolific enough in the big-bust genre. If Voluptuous Model of the Year and two time Plumper of the Year, ], isn't notable, I'm afraid Lorna Morgan isn't. ] 18:32, 6 September 2007 (UTC) | :'''Delete''' I'm not convinced that she is prolific enough in the big-bust genre. If Voluptuous Model of the Year and two time Plumper of the Year, ], isn't notable, I'm afraid Lorna Morgan isn't. ] 18:32, 6 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| * <span style="font-size: 85%;">Note: This debate has been added to the ] ]. ] 22:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)</span> | * <span style="font-size: 85%;">Note: This debate has been added to the ] ]. ] 22:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)</span> | ||
| : '''Keep'''. Don't know why. ] 22:19, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:19, 9 September 2007
Lorna Morgan
I don't think this woman's notable. Fails WP:PORNBIO. h i s r e s e a r c h 13:49, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:PORNBIO. Xihr 18:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I'm not convinced that she is prolific enough in the big-bust genre. If Voluptuous Model of the Year and two time Plumper of the Year, Kerry Marie, isn't notable, I'm afraid Lorna Morgan isn't. Epbr123 18:32, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 22:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Don't know why. UnknownMan 22:19, 9 September 2007 (UTC)