Misplaced Pages

talk:Account suspensions: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:06, 23 June 2005 editSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 02:10, 23 June 2005 edit undoJRM (talk | contribs)5,015 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:


:I think this is a good idea, and we should let Ed see whether it works. There are cases of serious policy violations where our hands are almost tied, and they shouldn't be. Noel, perhaps you could edit the page to tighten up that the specific policies have to be named. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 02:06, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC) :I think this is a good idea, and we should let Ed see whether it works. There are cases of serious policy violations where our hands are almost tied, and they shouldn't be. Noel, perhaps you could edit the page to tighten up that the specific policies have to be named. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 02:06, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
::No, I'm genuinely ''confused''&mdash;what does it ''do''? I don't object to some sort of trial at all&mdash;but what is being put on trial? I don't mind sounding obtuse if that's what's needed to get the explanation for idiots. :-) ] · ] 02:10, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:10, 23 June 2005

What, just "policies"? We don't have to specify which ones? Isn't that a little on the convenient side?

No wait. What I meant to say was: this page is redundant with Special:Log/Block and/or Special:Ipblocklist. Isn't it?

No wait with feeling. What is the purpose of this page, actually? It doesn't say. I suppose it's not to reinforce the clique of adminship by encouraging them to "me, too" the decisions made, and/or delineate the subcliques by encourage "me neither" responses? Because whatever it's supposed to do, I do believe that's what it's going to end up like, sure as WP:AN/I is doing it now. JRM · Talk 02:01, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)

I think this is a good idea, and we should let Ed see whether it works. There are cases of serious policy violations where our hands are almost tied, and they shouldn't be. Noel, perhaps you could edit the page to tighten up that the specific policies have to be named. SlimVirgin 02:06, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
No, I'm genuinely confused—what does it do? I don't object to some sort of trial at all—but what is being put on trial? I don't mind sounding obtuse if that's what's needed to get the explanation for idiots. :-) JRM · Talk 02:10, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)