| Revision as of 22:54, 9 September 2007 editPicaroon (talk | contribs)17,614 edits Revert to revision 155715199 dated 2007-09-04 22:01:05 by Epbr123 using popups← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:23, 9 September 2007 edit undoXihr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,319 edits rv; why are you deleting other peoples' !votes?Next edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| * <span style="font-size: 85%;">Note: This debate has been added to the ] ]. ] 21:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)</span> | * <span style="font-size: 85%;">Note: This debate has been added to the ] ]. ] 21:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)</span> | ||
| *'''Delete'''. No evidence of notability presented. ] 21:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. No evidence of notability presented. ] 21:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep'''. She is really a famous porn star. ] 22:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| **Fame doesn't equal notability. ] 22:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:23, 9 September 2007
Kianna Dior
Doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 14:38, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I disagree; she meets WP:PORNBIO. Xihr 20:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, right. How? Epbr123 20:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Eh? You didn't say how she fails it. She's well-known in her niche (big-boobed Asians), has made plenty of movies, etc. Xihr 21:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Being "well-known" and making plenty of movies isn't in the WP:PORNBIO criteria. Epbr123 22:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Eh? You didn't say how she fails it. She's well-known in her niche (big-boobed Asians), has made plenty of movies, etc. Xihr 21:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 21:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of notability presented. Tabercil 21:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. She is really a famous porn star. UnknownMan 22:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fame doesn't equal notability. Epbr123 22:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC)