User talk:Obedium: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 02:51, 25 September 2007 editMadman (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users15,171 editsm →September 2007: +article -_-← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:10, 26 September 2007 edit undoObedium (talk \| contribs)166 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 16:		Line 16:
	== September 2007 ==		== September 2007 ==
	<div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' in accordance with ] for violating the ] at ]. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock\|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. — <tt>] ]</tt> 02:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-3block -->		<div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' in accordance with ] for violating the ] at ]. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock\|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. — <tt>] ]</tt> 02:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-3block -->
			{{unblock\|your reason here}} I have included factual data, which some users simply do not like and keep deleting. Trying to reinstate facts does not constiute a 3RR violation. Several users simply ganging up and constantly reverting factual edits is what should be considered a violations. Remove this block now!

Revision as of 01:10, 26 September 2007

Welcome!

Hello, Obedium, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 22:02, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

WP:3RR on James Hansen

Hi Obedium. You have now repeatedly violated WP:3R (not to say WP:V) by adding various unsourced and misleading versions of the "Hansen predicted cooling" meme. Please stop this. Violation of WP:3RR can get you blocked. Please review that policy. --Stephan Schulz 02:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at James Hansen. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — madman bum and angel 02:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Obedium (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I have included factual data, which some users simply do not like and keep deleting. Trying to reinstate facts does not constiute a 3RR violation. Several users simply ganging up and constantly reverting factual edits is what should be considered a violations. Remove this block now!

Category:

Requests for unblock

Revision as of 02:51, 25 September 2007 editMadman (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users15,171 editsm →September 2007: +article -_-← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:10, 26 September 2007 edit undoObedium (talk \| contribs)166 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 16:		Line 16:
	== September 2007 ==		== September 2007 ==
	<div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' in accordance with ] for violating the ] at ]. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock\|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. — <tt>] ]</tt> 02:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-3block -->		<div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' in accordance with ] for violating the ] at ]. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock\|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. — <tt>] ]</tt> 02:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-3block -->
			{{unblock\|your reason here}} I have included factual data, which some users simply do not like and keep deleting. Trying to reinstate facts does not constiute a 3RR violation. Several users simply ganging up and constantly reverting factual edits is what should be considered a violations. Remove this block now!