| Revision as of 11:28, 27 September 2007 editJaakobou (talk | contribs)15,880 edits →camera← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:15, 27 September 2007 edit undoMr. Hicks The III (talk | contribs)240 edits →cameraNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| ::a few days ago, User PalestineRemembred explained why CAMERA is non-RS, however, there was similar discussion on ] regarding that source, which led to it's acceptance. <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>'']''</sup></font></b> 11:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC) | ::a few days ago, User PalestineRemembred explained why CAMERA is non-RS, however, there was similar discussion on ] regarding that source, which led to it's acceptance. <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>'']''</sup></font></b> 11:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :::Got it. Ok, I'll edit the article accordingly - and would appreciate your support there. ] 13:15, 27 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:15, 27 September 2007
Yeor
What on earth are you on about? Hornplease 21:49, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- The reasons were explained on the talkpage and in edit summaries. Don't go around calling people vandals while concealed under a new account, whoever you are.
- 'Sourced' information that misinterprets a source is always open to removal. In any case, you performed a blind revert, not only of material that was 'sourced'. Hornplease 21:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Really? Thanks awfully for letting me know about 3RR! You know, I would be amazed if someone blocked me short of 3RR for encouraging people to try discussion on the talkpage! It would be such fun to take that to AN/I. I note you haven't yet bothered to explain your blind revert.
- Oh, and less charitable, forsooth. Someone would have to be twelve to call something that removes a peacock-y phrase and inserts sourced material vandalism. Hornplease 22:02, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, do take it to AN/I, please, please. My edit comments pleading with people to use the talkpage are so pathetic, they deserve a wider audience.
- That my edit removed 'sourced' material is nonsense. As I have explained several times- including already on this talkpage - the citations to course pages do not support the text that the term is now widely used independent of BY's work. And removing sourced material is not a 'no-no'. Its done all the time. (As you no doubt already know.)
- And as for my past behaviour on that page, I note that I am the only one on the talkpage. Heh. Hornplease 22:15, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
camera
the article you've been debating about with another user has been mostly validated on battle of jenin. Jaakobou 19:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- I am not sure what you are talking about. Mr. Hicks The III 19:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- a few days ago, User PalestineRemembred explained why CAMERA is non-RS, however, there was similar discussion on battle of jenin regarding that source, which led to it's acceptance. Jaakobou 11:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Got it. Ok, I'll edit the article accordingly - and would appreciate your support there. Mr. Hicks The III 13:15, 27 September 2007 (UTC)