| Revision as of 00:19, 30 September 2007 edit162.84.205.111 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:20, 30 September 2007 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,612 editsm Signing comment by 162.84.205.111 - ""Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| I contend the use of this term in the movie does NOT warrant it's own page. IMO it should br re-worked into the main TPS report page and/or the Office Spce page. | I contend the use of this term in the movie does NOT warrant it's own page. IMO it should br re-worked into the main TPS report page and/or the Office Spce page. | ||
| In addition, it is poorly written, as it mixes tenses and contains several grammatical errors. | In addition, it is poorly written, as it mixes tenses and contains several grammatical errors. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:19, 30 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
Revision as of 00:20, 30 September 2007
Copyright noteThis article was created from content previously added to TPS report; please also consult that article's history for those who contributed those edits, and therefore hold the copyright, subject to the GFDL.I contend the use of this term in the movie does NOT warrant it's own page. IMO it should br re-worked into the main TPS report page and/or the Office Spce page.
In addition, it is poorly written, as it mixes tenses and contains several grammatical errors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.84.205.111 (talk) 00:19, 30 September 2007 (UTC)