| Revision as of 04:25, 4 October 2007 editRray (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,856 edits '''Speedy keep and snowball''' - The AfD was discussed on the talk page and the consensus was that the article should not be nominated for deletion. The article lists 2 references asserting notability← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:38, 4 October 2007 edit undoGavin.collins (talk | contribs)18,503 edits Response to RrayNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| '''Speedy keep and snowball''' - The AfD was discussed on the talk page and the consensus was that the article should not be nominated for deletion. The article lists 2 references asserting notability. It's hard to assume that this is anything but a bad faith AfD nomination considering the nominator's editing history and the recent discussion on the talk page of this article and on the nominator's personal talk page. ] 04:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | '''Speedy keep and snowball''' - The AfD was discussed on the talk page and the consensus was that the article should not be nominated for deletion. The article lists 2 references asserting notability. It's hard to assume that this is anything but a bad faith AfD nomination considering the nominator's editing history and the recent discussion on the talk page of this article and on the nominator's personal talk page. ] 04:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :*'''Comment''' Having read the ], I see no consensus was reached about ] or ]. The nomination is in good faith, and my suggestion to include this as a footnote in the article ] is a constructive one. --] 04:38, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:38, 4 October 2007
World of Greyhawk Fantasy Game Setting
- World of Greyhawk Fantasy Game Setting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This book of gaming instructions has no independent source demonstrating [WP:NOTABILITY
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction & fantasy deletions. --Gavin Collins 04:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Speedy keep and snowball - The AfD was discussed on the talk page and the consensus was that the article should not be nominated for deletion. The article lists 2 references asserting notability. It's hard to assume that this is anything but a bad faith AfD nomination considering the nominator's editing history and the recent discussion on the talk page of this article and on the nominator's personal talk page. Rray 04:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Having read the discussion, I see no consensus was reached about notability or independent sources. The nomination is in good faith, and my suggestion to include this as a footnote in the article Greyhawk is a constructive one. --Gavin Collins 04:38, 4 October 2007 (UTC)