| Revision as of 02:06, 28 September 2003 edit68.85.207.29 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:19, 27 October 2003 edit undoDaniel Quinlan (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators17,470 edits mods to introduction, South Africa sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ]] | ]] | ||
| '''Oligarchy''' is a ] where most political ] effectively rests with a small segment of society (typically the |
'''Oligarchy''' is a ] where most political ] effectively rests with a small segment of society (typically the most powerful, whether by wealth, military strength, ruthlessness, or political influence). The ] ] origins of the word "oligarchy" express the concepts of "few" and "rule". | ||
| Oligarchies are often controlled by a few powerful families whose children are raised and mentored to become inheritors of the power of the oligarchy, often at some sort of expense to those governed. This power may not always be exercised openly, the oligarchs preferring to remain "the ]," exerting control through ] means. It has also been suggested that most so-called ] countries fit the definition of oligarchy, in that the most ruthless segment of society comes to power by overthrowing other oligarchs. | Oligarchies are often controlled by a few powerful families whose children are raised and mentored to become inheritors of the power of the oligarchy, often at some sort of expense to those governed. This power may not always be exercised openly, the oligarchs preferring to remain "the ]," exerting control through ] means. It has also been suggested that most so-called ] countries fit the definition of oligarchy, in that the most ruthless segment of society comes to power by overthrowing other oligarchs. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| Oligarchies may also become instruments of transformation, insisting that monarchs or dictators share power, thereby opening the door to power-sharing by other elements of society. One example of this process occurred when ] nobles banded together in ] to force a reluctant King ] to sign the ], a tacit recognition both of King John's waning political power and of the existence of an incipient oligarchy. As English society continued to grow and develop, the Magna Carta was repeatedly revised (],], and ]), guaranteeing greater rights to greater numbers of people, thus setting the stage for ] ]. | Oligarchies may also become instruments of transformation, insisting that monarchs or dictators share power, thereby opening the door to power-sharing by other elements of society. One example of this process occurred when ] nobles banded together in ] to force a reluctant King ] to sign the ], a tacit recognition both of King John's waning political power and of the existence of an incipient oligarchy. As English society continued to grow and develop, the Magna Carta was repeatedly revised (],], and ]), guaranteeing greater rights to greater numbers of people, thus setting the stage for ] ]. | ||
| A modern example of oligarchy can be seen in ] during the ]. Here, the basic characteristics of oligarchy are particularly easy to observe, since the South African form of oligarchy was based on ]. After the ], a tacit agreement was reached between English- and Afrikaans-speaking whites. Together, they made up about twenty percent of the population, but this small percentage had access to virtually all the educational and trade opportunities, and they proceeded to deny this to the black majority even further than before. Although this process had been going on since the mid-], after ] it became official government policy and became known worldwide as ]. |
A modern example of oligarchy can be seen in ] during the ]. Here, the basic characteristics of oligarchy are particularly easy to observe, since the South African form of oligarchy was based on ]. After the ], a tacit agreement was reached between English- and Afrikaans-speaking whites. Together, they made up about twenty percent of the population, but this small percentage had access to virtually all the educational and trade opportunities, and they proceeded to deny this to the black majority even further than before. Although this process had been going on since the mid-], after ] it became official government policy and became known worldwide as ]. This lasted until the arrival of democracy in South Africa in ] punctuated by the transition to a democratically-elected government dominated by the black majority. | ||
| See also: ], ], ], ], ], ] | See also: ], ], ], ], ], ] | ||
Revision as of 03:19, 27 October 2003
Oligarchy is a form of government where most political power effectively rests with a small segment of society (typically the most powerful, whether by wealth, military strength, ruthlessness, or political influence). The Greek etymological origins of the word "oligarchy" express the concepts of "few" and "rule".
Oligarchies are often controlled by a few powerful families whose children are raised and mentored to become inheritors of the power of the oligarchy, often at some sort of expense to those governed. This power may not always be exercised openly, the oligarchs preferring to remain "the power behind the throne," exerting control through economic means. It has also been suggested that most so-called communist countries fit the definition of oligarchy, in that the most ruthless segment of society comes to power by overthrowing other oligarchs.
A society may become an oligarchy by default as an outgrowth of the shifting alliances of warring tribal chieftans, although any form of government may transform into an oligarchy at some point in its evolution. The most likely mechanism for this transformation is a gradual accumulation of otherwise unchecked economic power. Oligarchies may also evolve into more classically authoritarian forms of government, sometimes as the result of one family gaining asendency over the others. Many of the European monarchies established during the late Middle Ages began in this manner.
Oligarchies may also become instruments of transformation, insisting that monarchs or dictators share power, thereby opening the door to power-sharing by other elements of society. One example of this process occurred when English nobles banded together in 1215 to force a reluctant King John I of England to sign the Magna Carta, a tacit recognition both of King John's waning political power and of the existence of an incipient oligarchy. As English society continued to grow and develop, the Magna Carta was repeatedly revised (1216,1217, and 1225), guaranteeing greater rights to greater numbers of people, thus setting the stage for British constitutional monarchy.
A modern example of oligarchy can be seen in South Africa during the 20th century. Here, the basic characteristics of oligarchy are particularly easy to observe, since the South African form of oligarchy was based on racism. After the Boer War, a tacit agreement was reached between English- and Afrikaans-speaking whites. Together, they made up about twenty percent of the population, but this small percentage had access to virtually all the educational and trade opportunities, and they proceeded to deny this to the black majority even further than before. Although this process had been going on since the mid-18th century, after 1948 it became official government policy and became known worldwide as apartheid. This lasted until the arrival of democracy in South Africa in 1994 punctuated by the transition to a democratically-elected government dominated by the black majority.
See also: aristocracy, dictatorship, monarchy, crony capitalism, plutocracy, theocracy