| Revision as of 23:07, 9 October 2007 editAnythingyouwant (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors91,258 edits ArbCom notification← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:32, 12 October 2007 edit undoSad mouse (talk | contribs)860 edits →Why the reversion?: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| Hi FeloniousMonk, I have filed an arbitration request pertaining to your indefinite ban on me. is the link.] 23:07, 9 October 2007 (UTC) | Hi FeloniousMonk, I have filed an arbitration request pertaining to your indefinite ban on me. is the link.] 23:07, 9 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Why the reversion? == | |||
| The ID article said a Zogby poll of scientists stated X, but linked to a poll of Ohio voters. I removed the link and added "citation needed", because the link should connect to the poll of scientists. Why revert this? How did the poll of Ohio voters act as a reference? ] 04:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:32, 12 October 2007
feloniousmonk
Archives
You horrible person!
Why did you have to go and do something cool like that?
You leave me with no other option:
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For displays of sanity above and beyond the call of duty.--Kim Bruning 20:56, 2 October 2007 (UTC) |
--Kim Bruning 20:56, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
ArbCom
Hi FeloniousMonk, I have filed an arbitration request pertaining to your indefinite ban on me. Here is the link.Ferrylodge 23:07, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Why the reversion?
The ID article said a Zogby poll of scientists stated X, but linked to a poll of Ohio voters. I removed the link and added "citation needed", because the link should connect to the poll of scientists. Why revert this? How did the poll of Ohio voters act as a reference? Sad mouse 04:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC)