Revision as of 15:48, 12 October 2007 editGeo Swan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers112,843 edits →Administrative Review Board hearings← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:28, 29 November 2007 edit undoGed UK (talk | contribs)Administrators37,253 editsm Spelling/typo correctionNext edit → | ||
Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
| '''2.''' || | | '''2.''' || | ||
A source stated that the detainee was directly involved in assassination attempts. | A source stated that the detainee was directly involved in assassination attempts. | ||
The source stated that |
The source stated that the detainee also attempted to have other personnel participated in suicide missions. | ||
The detainee provided training on how to use explosive vests. | The detainee provided training on how to use explosive vests. | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 14:28, 29 November 2007
Abdul Razzak is a citizen of Afghanistan, held in extrajudicial detention in the United States Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, in Cuba. His detainee ID number is 942. JTF-GTMO analysts estimate he was born in 1939, in Kandahar, Afghanistan.
Combatant Status Review Tribunal
Initially the Bush administration asserted that they could withhold all the protections of the Geneva Conventions to captives from the war on terror. This policy was challenged before the Judicial branch. Critics argued that the USA could not evade its obligation to conduct a competent tribunals to determine whether captives are, or are not, entitled to the protections of prisoner of war status.
Subsequently the Department of Defense instituted the Combatant Status Review Tribunals. The Tribunals, however, were not authorized to determine whether the captives were lawful combatants -- rather they were merely empowered to make a recommendation as to whether the captive had previously been correctly determined to match the Bush administration's definition of an enemy combatant.
Razzak chose to participate in his Combatant Status Review Tribunal.
allegations
The allegations against Razzak were:
- a. -- The general summary of the allegations that establish an association with terrorism were missing from the transcript. --
- Detainee served as a Taliban driver beginning in 1992.
- Detainee is an al Qaida facilitator and smuggler.
- Detainee was a commander of a Taliban terrorist cell in Afghanistan.
- Detainee conducted an escort mission for Usama bin Laden in Jalalabad, Afghanistan.
- Detainee provided goods and funding for Taliban terrorist cells in Afghanistan.
- Detainee provided guidance in the terrorist training camp near Kandahar.
- b. -- The general summary of the allegations of hostile activity were missing from the transcript. --
- Detainee fought against United States forces in Kabul.
- Detainee provided weapons and explosives to a Taliban terrorist cell in Afghanistan.
- Detainee was involved in assassination attempts against Afghani government officials.
witnesses
Razak requested three witnesses; Abdul Wahled, Haji Abdul Zaher and Ismael Kahn. The Tribunal's President ruled that they were not reasonably available because they thought that they were all in Afghanistan, and the State Department's requests to the Afghan government had been gone unanswered.
Administrative Review Board hearings
Detainees who were determined to have been properly classified as "enemy combatants" were scheduled to have their dossier reviewed at annual Administrative Review Board hearings. The Administrative Review Boards weren't authorized to review whether a detainee qualified for POW status, and they weren't authorized to review whether a detainee should have been classified as an "enemy combatant".
They were authorized to consider whether a detainee should continue to be detained by the United States, because they continued to pose a threat -- or whether they could safely be repatriated to the custody of their home country, or whether they could be set free.
First annual Administrative Review Board hearing
A Summary of Evidence memo was prepared for his Administrative Review Board.
Transcript
Razzak chose to participate in his Administrative Review Board hearing.
Second annual Administrative Review Board hearing
A Summary of Evidence memo was prepared for his second annual Administrative Review Board on August 5 2006.
The following primary factors favor continued detention:
|
Commitment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Training | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Connections/Associations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other Relevant Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following primary factors favor release or transfer:
|
The detainee claims he is not a Taliban member. |
|
The detainee vehemently denies that he is currently associated with the Taliban. |
|
The detainee states that the Taliban is a stupid organization. |
|
An individual that was part of a 40-man team was under the command of Abdul Razaq [sic]. |
|
The individual described Abdbul Razaq [sic] as having dark eyes, a full beard, and taller than himself. The individual claims this Abdul Razaq [sic] is not the same person as the detainee. |
References
- list of prisoners (.pdf), US Department of Defense, May 15 2006
- ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Abdul Razzak's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 55-60
- (Spc Timothy Book (Friday March 10 2006). "Review process unprecedented" (PDF). JTF-GTMO Public Affairs Office. pp. pg 1. Retrieved 2007-10-10.
{{cite news}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^
OARDEC (16 August 2005). "Unclassified Summary of Evidence for Administrative Review Board in the case of Razzak, Abdul" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. pp. pages 61-63. Retrieved 2007-10-12.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Check date values in:|date=
(help) Cite error: The named reference "ArbSummaryOfEvidenceAbdulRazzak942" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). - Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Abdul Razzak's Administrative Review Board hearing - page 272