| Revision as of 05:23, 21 October 2007 editKsy92003 (talk | contribs)10,990 edits →User talk:Sasha Callahan: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:25, 21 October 2007 edit undoBudlight (talk | contribs)230 edits →User talk:Sasha CallahanNext edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| ] You are in danger of violating the ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:User talk:Sasha Callahan|  on ]}}. Please cease further reverts or you may be ] from editing. <!-- Template:3RR4 --> ''']'''<small>]</small> 05:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC) | ] You are in danger of violating the ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:User talk:Sasha Callahan|  on ]}}. Please cease further reverts or you may be ] from editing. <!-- Template:3RR4 --> ''']'''<small>]</small> 05:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| * You aren't supposed to revert comments left by others. I'm simply adding my comments back. This place has gone way down hill. --] 05:25, 21 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:25, 21 October 2007
I think it's better to change your username because it resembles to a trademarked name (Anheuser-Busch's Bud Light). Anyway, welcome! --Bigtop 16:43, 2 August 2006 (UTC) why did you remove the urls??? what do you mean SPAM??? (Matchless)
cyclechaos.com
You wrote on my talk page:
- The link to my website wasn't originally added by me. I think you should consider simply whether it is a useful link. I don't see where any wikipedia policy such as what you referenced can hold up to any supposed "standards" of wikipedia. There is another such policy that states that users can't edit articles about themselves, yet Jimmy Wales the founder of wikipedia, has edited his own article numerous times.--Budlight 19:13, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Please see WP:WEB and WP:External_links.
Cyclechaos.com has been around a few months. According to whois the domainname was registered in July of this year. I looked at the forums for chaoscycle.com and a nick by the name of 'Budlight' is listed as the administrator. This user account was registered in July of this year, also. Alexa.com shows that this site is not in the top 100,000 sites and it get very few page views. It is a new site and doesn't have "substantial longevity" to be in external links. It is non-notable because the forums are virtually empty and the site get very few hits on its own.
Therefore, it appears to me that you are using Misplaced Pages to promote your own site. The link to your site has been removed more than once before, and it is unlikely to stick for the reasons I gave above. In fact, intend to revert your change if someone hasn't already done so.
Gregarious Lonewolf 19:46, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Your edits to Talk:Motorcycle
Please do not strike out other users comments on talk pages. It is considered rude because it implies that the original user retracted his statments. If you wish to make a comment on another user's statements, please leave a note on the article talk page or the talk page of the user. Continuing to inappropriately refactor other user's comments could result in your being blocked for disruption. Please reserve the use of the strike tag for your own comments. Thanks! —Malber (talk • contribs • game) 18:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Golden Rule (Competition)
A tag has been placed on Golden Rule (Competition), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages per CSD G1.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. SashaCall /(Talk!) 04:50, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
October 2007
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. SashaCall /(Talk!) 04:52, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Lay Down Sally
Please do not disrupt the encyclopedia to make a point. If you disagree with a speedy deletion tag placed by another editor, you place a {{hangon}} tag on the article (as clearly explained in the tag and on your talk page above), and explain your reasoning on the discussion page. Placing deletion tags on articles written by that editor in retribution is disruptive, and may result in you being banned. — Coren 05:18, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
User talk:Sasha Callahan
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on User talk:Sasha Callahan. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. Ksy92003(talk) 05:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- You aren't supposed to revert comments left by others. I'm simply adding my comments back. This place has gone way down hill. --Budlight 05:25, 21 October 2007 (UTC)