| Revision as of 06:59, 24 October 2007 editRfc1394 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Template editors16,687 edits →Examples← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:00, 24 October 2007 edit undoRfc1394 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Template editors16,687 edits →ExamplesNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| ==Examples== | ==Examples== | ||
| *]: This is a common name, and scholars generally agree that a massacre took place. Rule #1 applies, and rule #2 would give the same result. | *]: This is a common name, and scholars generally agree that a massacre took place. Rule #1 applies, and rule #2 would give the same result. | ||
| *]: This is the common name, but redirects to ], which in view of everything that happened is probably a better title since more than just rapes occurred. | *]: This is the common name (Rule #1 applies), but redirects to ], which in view of everything that happened is probably a better title since more than just rapes occurred. However, "massacre" probably shouldn't have been capitalized. | ||
| *]: This is a common name, so it should be used even though many people consider it to be propagandistic. Rule #1 applies. | *]: This is a common name, so it should be used even though many people consider it to be propagandistic. Rule #1 applies. | ||
| *]: "Torture" was a controversial word here. There is no common name, so rule #1 does not apply. There is general scholarly agreement that torture has taken place, so rule #2 kicks in. | *]: "Torture" was a controversial word here. There is no common name, so rule #1 does not apply. There is general scholarly agreement that torture has taken place, so rule #2 kicks in. | ||
Revision as of 07:00, 24 October 2007
 | This guideline documents an English Misplaced Pages naming convention. Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this guideline's talk page. |
The following guidelines apply to events and activities such as military conflicts and terrorist incidents.
Conventions
Article names for current and historical events are often controversial. In particular, the use of strong words such as "massacre" can be a focus of heated debate. The use of particular strong words is neither universally encouraged nor discouraged. The spirit of these guidelines is to favour familiar terms used to identify the event. Rules to select a name should be applied in the following sequence:
- If there is a particular common name for the event, it should be used even if it implies a controversial point of view.
- If there is no common name for the event, and there is a generally accepted word used when identifying the event, the title should include the word even if it is a strong one such as "massacre" or "genocide" or "war crime". However, to keep article names short, avoid including more words than are necessary to identify the event. For example, the adjective "terrorist" is usually not needed.
- If there is no common name for the event and no generally accepted descriptive word, use a descriptive name that does not carry POV implications.
Definitions
A common name or standing expression exists if most English speakers who are aware of the topic call it the same thing. Slight variations on the name, such as changes in word order, count as the same common name. For example, World War II is often called the Second World War; they are close enough to be considered variations of the same common name.
A generally accepted word is a word for which there is consensus, among scholars in the real world, on its applicability to the event. The use of a strong word may still be controversial among politicians, Misplaced Pages editors, or the general public.
Neutral Point of View
Regardless of which rule applies, there may still be different points of view on how to characterize the event, and some of these points of view may be contrary to the title. These points of view should be discussed in the article. By longstanding tradition, Misplaced Pages article names are not expected to fairly represent all points of view.
Examples
- My Lai massacre: This is a common name, and scholars generally agree that a massacre took place. Rule #1 applies, and rule #2 would give the same result.
- Rape of Nanking: This is the common name (Rule #1 applies), but redirects to Nanking Massacre, which in view of everything that happened is probably a better title since more than just rapes occurred. However, "massacre" probably shouldn't have been capitalized.
- War on Terrorism: This is a common name, so it should be used even though many people consider it to be propagandistic. Rule #1 applies.
- Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse: "Torture" was a controversial word here. There is no common name, so rule #1 does not apply. There is general scholarly agreement that torture has taken place, so rule #2 kicks in.
- Darfur conflict: The term "Darfur genocide" is used, but is not common enough to constitute a common name, so rule #1 does not apply. Many people consider the conflict to be a genocide, however there is no general scholarly agreement on this yet, so rule #2 does not apply. Hence rule #3 applies, and "conflict" is used instead of "genocide."
- September 11, 2001 attacks: A debate here concluded that there was no common name for the event. Scholars agree that the events were acts of terrorism, however adding the word "terrorist" to the title would have given it more words than necessary to identify the event.
See also
- Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Military history#Naming conventions
- Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (numbers and dates)#Articles on events
- Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions#Elections