| Revision as of 19:04, 25 October 2007 editScartol (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,871 edits →Noah Lottick: vote to merge← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:51, 25 October 2007 edit undoDeepfriedokra (talk | contribs)Administrators173,342 editsm mergeNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| * '''Merge''' into ]. I agree that the article has serious problems, but I also think the information is notable and deserves a place here, even if not its own page. – ] · ] 19:04, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | * '''Merge''' into ]. I agree that the article has serious problems, but I also think the information is notable and deserves a place here, even if not its own page. – ] · ] 19:04, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Merge''' per above.] 19:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:51, 25 October 2007
Noah Lottick
Non-notable person committed non-notable suicide. Article is inherently POV as his only mention in media is as a take-off point for a POV piece attacking Scientology and, IMO, is more of a journalist styling than any inherent notability for Lottick. Note that the basis of notability mentioned in the article is "controversy" but there was no actual (notable) controversy over the suicide; no charges filed, etc. Please do not be impressed by the number of references as there is a degree of duplication, triviality, and inclusion of non-related notable issues such as the fight between the Church of Scientology and Time Magazine. Note also that the large number of links to the article is due to inclusion in the Scientology template, a very questionable inclusion given the total lack of relative importance. In the interest of full disclosure, I am a Scientologist but I rarely nominate articles for deletion and only those few that really, IMO, do not belong here. Thank you for your time. Justanother 15:54, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Merge into Scientology controversy. I agree that the article has serious problems, but I also think the information is notable and deserves a place here, even if not its own page. – Scartol · Talk 19:04, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Merge per above. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 19:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)