| Revision as of 18:14, 9 November 2007 editYidisheryid (talk | contribs)5,331 edits →Shwartzman Etrogs← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:17, 9 November 2007 edit undoYidisheryid (talk | contribs)5,331 edits →Shwartzman EtrogsNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small><small>] 07:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)</small> | *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small><small>] 07:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Delete''' NN company. Information is also ]. The only information that might be able to merge to the etrog article, or perhaps create a legitimate article on its own, is if there is documentation of the existance of this 'ordang' variety, hence the original prod. --] 09:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' NN company. Information is also ]. The only information that might be able to merge to the etrog article, or perhaps create a legitimate article on its own, is if there is documentation of the existance of this 'ordang' variety, hence the original prod. --] 09:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' even if it is a company it is still a different subject, we can have 2 articles on |
*'''Keep''' even if it is a company it is still a different subject, we can have 2 articles on Pepsi and on coke since they are different although they are both cola companies, keep in mind that a schwartzman esrog is not the same as others, and yes to clarify it is the most notable esrog than all other brands, since it is seeds from the esrog that the biggest Posek of the last generation used, and when it comes to be '''mehader''' on such a mitsve people do only settle for the best. this is written in all Yiddish media and unfortunately i cannot find it online to source it--] 11:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Non-notable. We have standards here, and the article on this company currently fails those standards. -- | *'''Delete''' Non-notable. We have standards here, and the article on this company currently fails those standards. -- | ||
| ] 16:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC) | ] 16:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:17, 9 November 2007
Shwartzman Etrogs
- Shwartzman Etrogs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This article was set up as a prod a few days ago by User:Shuki out of concern for WP:COI, WP:N. Most of it is certainly self-serving self-advertising violating WP:NOT#ADVERTIZING, but there is a small amount of useful information that should be merged into the main Etrog article. IZAK 07:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Merge (redirect) and combine summarized information into Etrog article. IZAK 07:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions. IZAK 07:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete NN company. Information is also WP:OR. The only information that might be able to merge to the etrog article, or perhaps create a legitimate article on its own, is if there is documentation of the existance of this 'ordang' variety, hence the original prod. --Shuki 09:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep even if it is a company it is still a different subject, we can have 2 articles on Pepsi and on coke since they are different although they are both cola companies, keep in mind that a schwartzman esrog is not the same as others, and yes to clarify it is the most notable esrog than all other brands, since it is seeds from the esrog that the biggest Posek of the last generation used, and when it comes to be mehader on such a mitsve people do only settle for the best. this is written in all Yiddish media and unfortunately i cannot find it online to source it--יודל 11:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable. We have standards here, and the article on this company currently fails those standards. --
Avi 16:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Save the data and delete the article. Yossiea 16:40, 9 November 2007 (UTC)