| Revision as of 20:51, 28 January 2005 editResearcher99 (talk | contribs)511 editsm Start it | Revision as of 06:22, 7 October 2005 edit undo62.243.86.27 (talk) →I have researched Polygamy for yearsNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| I have researched the topic of ] for many years. I understand that that is a controversial topic for many people. If you are going to say anything on the ] wikis, please be sure to leave your bias "at the door" and to be aware of how little knowledge you may actually have about the topic (''if you have not yet studied it for years''). The wiki must have ]. Thank you. -- Researcher99 | I have researched the topic of ] for many years. I understand that that is a controversial topic for many people. If you are going to say anything on the ] wikis, please be sure to leave your bias "at the door" and to be aware of how little knowledge you may actually have about the topic (''if you have not yet studied it for years''). The wiki must have ]. Thank you. -- Researcher99 | ||
| Dear Researcher99 - | |||
| "If you have not yet studied it for years"... but... what happened to Socratic modesty? (This actually also concerns everyone else in the ongoing Polygamy discussion!). | |||
Revision as of 06:22, 7 October 2005
I have researched Polygamy for years
I have researched the topic of polygamy for many years. I understand that that is a controversial topic for many people. If you are going to say anything on the polygamy wikis, please be sure to leave your bias "at the door" and to be aware of how little knowledge you may actually have about the topic (if you have not yet studied it for years). The wiki must have NPOV. Thank you. -- Researcher99
Dear Researcher99 -
"If you have not yet studied it for years"... but... what happened to Socratic modesty? (This actually also concerns everyone else in the ongoing Polygamy discussion!).