Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Dawdle: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:06, 18 November 2007 editEmargul (talk | contribs)45 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 18:07, 18 November 2007 edit undoEmargul (talk | contribs)45 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:


My only problem is that I browse though your articles and many are less notable than this. So i don't see why this can't fall in that catagory or higher. If you delete this i feel that wikipedia needs to go through all their articles becuase there notability is not high either too.] (]) 18:06, 18 November 2007 (UTC) My only problem is that I browse though your articles and many are less notable than this. So i don't see why this can't fall in that catagory or higher. If you delete this i feel that wikipedia needs to go through all their articles becuase there notability is not high either too.] (]) 18:06, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
:also its a stub so stubs i don't feel go under the notability rules as much becuase more could be added.

Revision as of 18:07, 18 November 2007

Dawdle

Dawdle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Nom - speedied several times. Fails WP:CORP and WP:WEB. This new website simply isn't notable. However, its creator doesn't seem to "get it", so I thought an AfD might provide a more suitable forum for the discussion. Rklawton (talk) 17:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

My only problem is that I browse though your articles and many are less notable than this. So i don't see why this can't fall in that catagory or higher. If you delete this i feel that wikipedia needs to go through all their articles becuase there notability is not high either too.Emargul (talk) 18:06, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

also its a stub so stubs i don't feel go under the notability rules as much becuase more could be added.
Categories: