Revision as of 11:33, 24 November 2007 editM.K (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers13,165 edits rename | Revision as of 11:57, 24 November 2007 edit undoIulius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers13,142 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Current tile is alien to English historiography. Even silly google game proves that there is no single hint on this so called ''Ostrów Agreement'', , while '''Treaty of Astravas''' quite well established . So my question is there any opposition to speedy rename this article to '''Treaty of Astravas'''? ] (]) 11:33, 24 November 2007 (UTC) | Current tile is alien to English historiography. Even silly google game proves that there is no single hint on this so called ''Ostrów Agreement'', , while '''Treaty of Astravas''' quite well established . So my question is there any opposition to speedy rename this article to '''Treaty of Astravas'''? ] (]) 11:33, 24 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
:I agree that either Belarusian either Lithuanian spelling shoul be used.] (]) 11:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:57, 24 November 2007
Lithuania Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Rename
Current tile is alien to English historiography. Even silly google game proves that there is no single hint on this so called Ostrów Agreement, , while Treaty of Astravas quite well established . So my question is there any opposition to speedy rename this article to Treaty of Astravas? M.K. (talk) 11:33, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- I agree that either Belarusian either Lithuanian spelling shoul be used.Iulius (talk) 11:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC)