Revision as of 12:22, 24 November 2007 editIulius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers13,142 edits →Rename← Previous edit |
Revision as of 12:24, 24 November 2007 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,536 editsm Signing comment by Iulius - "→Rename: "Next edit → |
Line 6: |
Line 6: |
|
:I agree that either Belarusian either Lithuanian spelling shoul be used.] (]) 11:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC) |
|
:I agree that either Belarusian either Lithuanian spelling shoul be used.] (]) 11:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC) |
|
:: Yes, Belarussian name is good too. I have no problems with it. ] (]) 11:59, 24 November 2007 (UTC)p.s. there is another invented name here |
|
:: Yes, Belarussian name is good too. I have no problems with it. ] (]) 11:59, 24 November 2007 (UTC)p.s. there is another invented name here |
|
:::I actually manage to "find" Astravets in English wiki; the reference seems to be correct. |
|
:::I actually manage to "find" Astravets in English wiki; the reference seems to be correct. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:22, 24 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Current tile is alien to English historiography. Even silly google game proves that there is no single hint on this so called Ostrów Agreement, , while Treaty of Astravas quite well established . So my question is there any opposition to speedy rename this article to Treaty of Astravas? M.K. (talk) 11:33, 24 November 2007 (UTC)