Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Umbrella Biohazard Countermeasure Service: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:01, 3 December 2007 editLenin and McCarthy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,569 edits redirect← Previous edit Revision as of 17:12, 3 December 2007 edit undoJudgesurreal777 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers50,231 edits Umbrella Biohazard Countermeasure ServiceNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
::::::Why have an encyclopedia filled with trivia and junk? And besides, I know a lot of the people who help delete articles, and they are some of the most active people in building up articles, especially fiction ones. ] (]) 22:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC) ::::::Why have an encyclopedia filled with trivia and junk? And besides, I know a lot of the people who help delete articles, and they are some of the most active people in building up articles, especially fiction ones. ] (]) 22:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
:::::::The fact that so many of our contributors are willing to volunteer time and effort to these articles suggest that a lot of our editors and readers do not regard them as "junk." Best, --<font face="Times New Roman">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 22:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC) :::::::The fact that so many of our contributors are willing to volunteer time and effort to these articles suggest that a lot of our editors and readers do not regard them as "junk." Best, --<font face="Times New Roman">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 22:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
::::::::And when its gone, they will contribute to articles that actually improve the encyclopedia. ] 17:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', there's only so much space here for video game trivia. <font face="Times">]</font><small><sup>'']''</sup></small> 21:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC) *'''Delete''', there's only so much space here for video game trivia. <font face="Times">]</font><small><sup>'']''</sup></small> 21:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. This is just trivial plot information. Misplaced Pages isn't a guide to every little plot detail for a video game (or any subject for that matter). ] (]) 06:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. This is just trivial plot information. Misplaced Pages isn't a guide to every little plot detail for a video game (or any subject for that matter). ] (]) 06:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:12, 3 December 2007

Umbrella Biohazard Countermeasure Service

Umbrella Biohazard Countermeasure Service (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and as such is just an in-universe repetition of plot elements from the Resident Evil video game and film articles. This is thus all duplicative, this can be safely deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC) Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

References, not "being in a movie" justify notability. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
It seems to get a lot of hits. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 22:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
It seems to be mostly wikipedia mirrors, so not that impressive. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
The shear number is really impressive (admittedly, I didn't even expect that many hits). Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 22:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
LOL what's impressive? There is not one reference in the hits! :) Please be serious if you want to keep debating this articles notability, or any other for that matter. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:42, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
The fact that the topic has attracted that much interest is impressive. Besides, why focus on deleting stuff people worked on rather than improving articles? Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 22:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Why have an encyclopedia filled with trivia and junk? And besides, I know a lot of the people who help delete articles, and they are some of the most active people in building up articles, especially fiction ones. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
The fact that so many of our contributors are willing to volunteer time and effort to these articles suggest that a lot of our editors and readers do not regard them as "junk." Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 22:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
And when its gone, they will contribute to articles that actually improve the encyclopedia. Judgesurreal777 17:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Categories: