Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Vote/Endlessdan: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007 | Vote Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:06, 3 December 2007 editCaulde (talk | contribs)21,354 edits →Oppose: o← Previous edit Revision as of 16:31, 3 December 2007 edit undoPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,769 edits →OpposeNext edit →
Line 104: Line 104:
# '''Oppose''' Straight, stone cold waste of fucking bandwidth. If you're bored at work, make a LOLcat or something. ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ])</span> 15:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC) # '''Oppose''' Straight, stone cold waste of fucking bandwidth. If you're bored at work, make a LOLcat or something. ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ])</span> 15:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
# '''Oppose''' &mdash; ] <sub>]</sub> 16:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC) # '''Oppose''' &mdash; ] <sub>]</sub> 16:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
# Not convinced.--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 16:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:31, 3 December 2007

Please Note: Extended comments may be moved to the talk page.

Endlessdan

Voting for me is a vote for straight stone cold chillin. No gimmicks needed. EndlessDan 17:54, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Support

  1. Moral Support, for actually wanting to do this. This fellow candidate appriciates your enthusiasm. Wizardman 00:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  2. —trey(wiki) 00:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  3. It was very bold of you to do this, and for that, you get my support. Kwsn (Ni!) 00:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  4. Nice answers to questions. Tim Q. Wells 00:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  5. Quite sincerely, what the arbcom needs. Breath of fresh air. Martinp23 00:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  6. For actually wanting the hellish job that is arbcom (and not being an ego mad nutjob like some who've wanted it) ... you've got my vote.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 00:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  7. east.718 at 00:33, December 3, 2007
  8. I feel like shaking the tables of ArbCom and electing someone more chill than I could ever wish to be. MessedRocker (talk) (write these articles) 00:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  9. Yes, makes a mockery of these elections. —Random832 00:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  10. Moral support – Makes these elections less dull. —Animum § 00:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  11. Yamanbaiia 00:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  12. --U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 00:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  13. Even if you don't get elected, feel free to apply some straight stone cold chillin to editing disputes. Gracenotes § 00:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
    Support conditionally. Extended comments moved to talk page. -- Ned Scott 01:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  14. Makes a balance for the serious side and a (nonexistent) funny side. PrestonH 01:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  15. Moral Support sh¤y 01:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  16. --Doc 01:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  17. Mike H. Celebrating three years of being hotter than Paris 02:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  18. krimpet⟲ 02:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  19. I did not expect to support. Húsönd 02:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  20. *votes for straight stone cold chillin* Dihydrogen Monoxide 03:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  21. Videmus Omnia 03:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  22. :) Snowball support for a guaranteed fail, thanks for the stone cold answers to your questions DUDE. --Cactus.man ✍ 03:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  23. Strangely more with it than many others. Why the hell not? --Bdj 03:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  24. He'd only be one stone cold voice out of 15. It'd be nice to laugh at ArbCom every now and then instead of always holding my head and crying; and an outsider's perspective would be valuable. --JayHenry 03:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  25. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 04:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  26. You appear to be more sensible than some of the other candidates running in this election. Spebi 04:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  27. Moral support. I dorftrottel I talk I 05:21, December 3, 2007
  28. Strong support. Seems very reasonable. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 05:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  29. - Nice enthusiasm. Scarian 08:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  30. Neil ☎ 10:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
    Support — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanBealeCocks (talk • contribs)
    Indented vote. Sorry, but 150 mainspace edits before November 1 are required to vote. — TKD::Talk 12:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  31.  Grue  13:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  32. The enlightened take things lightly. the wub "?!" 14:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  33. Indeed they do WilyD 15:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 00:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  2. — Coren  00:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  3. ragesoss 00:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  4. Chaz 00:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  5. Oppose (my fuller vote explanations) -- Jd2718 00:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  6. No, makes a mockery of this elections This is a Secret 00:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  7. Definitely not. Rjd0060 00:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  8. Nufy8 00:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  9. futurebird 00:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  10. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  11. – Gurch (talk) 00:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  12. Hell no. Nick 00:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  13. Good God, no. Qst 00:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  14. Mackensen (talk) 01:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  15. Stardust8212 01:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  16. Snowolf 01:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  17. -- drini 01:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  18. Oppose -- Avi 01:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  19. Captain panda 01:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  20. I thought this was a joke at first. Absolutely not. --Coredesat 01:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  21. SQL 02:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  22. Alexfusco5 02:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  23.  M2Ys4U 02:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  24. Cryptic 02:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  25. Zocky | picture popups 02:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  26. Rebecca 02:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  27. Oppose Thatcher131 02:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  28. Icestorm815 02:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  29. Zginder (talk) (Contrib) 02:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC) Do not give up on you quest. I just do not think you are ready.
  30. Nor will he ever be. ⇒SWATJester 03:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  31. Mercury 03:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  32. GlassCobra 03:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  33. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  34. KTC 03:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  35. — madman bum and angel 03:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  36. Oppose -Dureo 03:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  37. — xaosflux 04:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  38. —Mira 05:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  39. I appreciate the fresh approach but I don't think you would make a good arbitrator. James086 06:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  40. TMF 06:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  41. --MONGO 06:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  42. - Crockspot 07:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  43. Oppose — does not seems serious. --Jack Merridew 07:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  44. If you think your nomination was very funny, you're awfully wrong. MaxSem 07:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  45. DrKiernan 08:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  46. Who are you? — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 08:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  47. I'm all for straight stone cold chillin, but no. Shem 09:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  48. Stone cold no. --Mcginnly | Natter 10:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  49. — TKD::Talk 10:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  50. Are you serious? Stifle (talk) 11:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  51. I smiled, but sorry, rather have serious candidates elected. --Stormie 11:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  52. Sorry, but that is not a really good way to show your "motivation and determination" as an arbitrator..not funny..--Cometstyles 12:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  53. Johnbod 12:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  54. Oppose, obviously. Splash - tk 13:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  55. Oppose ArbCom is not a venue for absurdist comedy. Xoloz 13:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  56. Davewild 13:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  57. Addhoc 14:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  58. --barneca 14:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  59. Endless Dan 14:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC) Preposterous! This card is not ArbCom material!
  60. Oppose as per Stormie. Mindraker 15:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  61. Oppose Waste of time.Rhinoracer 15:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  62. Oppose Straight, stone cold waste of fucking bandwidth. If you're bored at work, make a LOLcat or something. Lurker (said · done) 15:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  63. Oppose — Rudget contributions 16:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  64. Not convinced.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 16:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)