| Revision as of 13:59, 5 December 2007 editKevinalewisBot (talk | contribs)13,601 editsm (BOT - WP:NOVEL newsletter delivery using AWB) using AWB← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:15, 13 December 2007 edit undoKaiba (talk | contribs)12,047 edits indefblocked redirectNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{checkuserblock-account}} | |||
| ==Blocked == | |||
| I have blocked you for abject stupidity. It's kind of hard to imagine what else you would have wanted, given that edit. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 13:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Alright :) ] 13:54, 15 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::And I have unblocked. That was not a reason for a block without warning in any way shape or form. ]] 05:28, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::: I've reblocked but for only 24 hours. The edit to David's page was completely unacceptable and you should have known better. ] 05:37, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::That works. ]] 05:38, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| What a surprise to see my name on ANI. Thanks for the notification... ] 18:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :No, I did not expect an indef block nor 'want' one. It was a momentary lapse of judgement brought on by my frustration with the template wording ("Expresed a concern"? Give me a break) and obviously a pretty stupid thing to do. I didn't argue with the block as from my observations I can see that people who get blocked indef and request unblocking somehow magically end up with their talk pages protected. ] 18:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::And Guy, your comments about 'not that much of a contributor' are a bit rich coming from someone who spends most of their time bitching people out on ANI and arguing about policy. ] 18:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| But I of course apologise to David Gerard for making such a lame attempt at a point, even though he does not appear to be bothered. :) ] 18:50, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == RfA == | |||
| I considered not spamming talk pages but not saying "thanks" just isn't me. The support was remarkable and appreciated. I only hope that I am able to help a little on here. Please let me know if I can help you or equally if you find any of my actions questionable. Thanks & regards --] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">]</span></small></sup></b> 11:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| You have been checkuser-blocked for abusive sockpuppetry. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 15:46, 17 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''indefinitely blocked''' from editing in accordance with ] for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:abusive sockpuppetry|'''abusive sockpuppetry'''|repeated ]}}. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:y|]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 16:05, 17 November 2007 (UTC)|}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3}} -->{{{category|]}}} | |||
| Really? Who is my sockpuppet? ] 17:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *Under checkuser policies, the details of the IP sockpuppetry you've been amusing yourself with may not be released to the public. They're just IP numbers, anyway. I've not yet blocked the multiple usernames you've also been using. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 18:13, 17 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :*IPs are me just being too lazy to log in; I've never votestacked or anything of the like. I've been editing semi-constructively from IPs for a fairly long time, I only resumed use of this account recently to participate in the ArbCom elections. Multiple usernames? Let me know when you do block them, then, I'd be interested to see who they are. ] 22:30, 17 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::*Oh and feel free to post whichever IPs you feel that I've abused, I have no qualms about my IP usage remaining private. ] 23:31, 17 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *Seconded, the checkuser data is clear and obvious. (Josh has asked other checkers to review.) - ] (]) 16:19, 18 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *Doubly seconded. From what I've seen this is very clear. ] ] 16:36, 18 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *Redoubled ] (]) 17:40, 18 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :*Okay, I guess I'll just reset my router and start a new account. Catch ya laters. ] 00:13, 19 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::*And note that this does not mean that I accept allegations of abusing accounts. Just that it's much easier to start a new account than argue with people who refuse to give me the evidence against me, even via email. ] 00:15, 19 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::*And I'm looking a Jpgordon's block log and am not seeing the name of a single account I recognise . Hmm, funny that. ] 02:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XIX - December 2007 == | |||
| The ''']''' of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. | |||
| <small>This is an automated delivery by ]</small> -- 13:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:15, 13 December 2007
Redirect to: