Rosalind Picard: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:34, 6 December 2007 editOrangemarlin (talk \| contribs)30,771 editsm Reverted to revision 176182524 by Circeus; This is basically her notability. And not to be too critical, but one comment on Talk is not sufficient for such a large deletion.using TW ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:16, 7 December 2007 edit undoSxeptomaniac (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers1,947 edits Not true. If signing that document is her noteworthiness, why don't we have articles on all of the 514 signers?Next edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:
	MIT's press release for Picard's textbook, ''Affective Computing'', states, "According to Rosalind Picard, if we want computers to be genuinely intelligent and to interact naturally with us, we must give computers the ability to recognize, understand, even to have and express emotions."<ref name=affective></ref>		MIT's press release for Picard's textbook, ''Affective Computing'', states, "According to Rosalind Picard, if we want computers to be genuinely intelligent and to interact naturally with us, we must give computers the ability to recognize, understand, even to have and express emotions."<ref name=affective></ref>

			In ], the ] reported<ref name=NYT> , Kenneth Chang, ], February 21, 2006.</ref> that Picard was one of a small number of nationally prominent researchers, out of 514 scientists and engineers, whose names appeared on the ]'s controversial petition, "]".<ref></ref>
	=="A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism"==
	{{details more\|A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism}}
	In ], the ] reported<ref name=NYT> , Kenneth Chang, ], February 21, 2006.</ref> that Picard was one of a small number of nationally prominent researchers, out of 514 scientists and engineers, whose names appeared on the ]'s controversial petition, "]".<ref></ref> The petition, a two-sentence statement, has been widely used by its sponsor, the ], and some of its ] in a ] to discredit ] and to promote the teaching of ] in public schools.<ref name=NYT/><ref></ref><ref name=ForrestMayPaper>{{citation \| url= http://www.centerforinquiry.net/uploads/attachments/intelligent-design.pdf\| title = Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals. A Position Paper from the Center for Inquiry, Office of Public Policy\| first = Barbara\| last = Forrest\| author-link = Barbara Forrest \| date = ],]\| month = May\| year = 2007\| publisher = Center for Inquiry, Inc.\| place = Washington, D.C.\|accessdate = 2007-08-06}}.</ref><ref name=meyer_seattle_times> Linda Shaw. The Seattle Times, March 31, 2005.</ref>

	==Bibliography==		==Bibliography==

Revision as of 00:16, 7 December 2007

Rosalind W. Picard is director of the Affective Computing Research Group at the MIT Media Lab, and co-director of the Things That Think Consortium. Picard is the author of Affective Computing, published in 1997. In 2005, she was named a Fellow of the IEEE.

Biography

Professor Picard holds a bachelor's degree in electrical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and master's and doctorate degrees, both in electrical engineering and computer science, from MIT. She has been a member of the faculty at the MIT Media Laboratory since 1991, with tenure since 1997.

Picard is a researcher in the field of affective computing and the founder and director of the Affective Computing Research Group at the MIT Media Lab. The Affective Computing Research Group develops tools, techniques, and devices for sensing, interpreting, and processing emotion signals that drive state-of-the-art systems which respond intelligently to human emotional states. Applications of their research include improved tutoring systems and assistive technology for use in alleviating autism.

MIT's press release for Picard's textbook, Affective Computing, states, "According to Rosalind Picard, if we want computers to be genuinely intelligent and to interact naturally with us, we must give computers the ability to recognize, understand, even to have and express emotions."

In February 2006, the New York Times reported that Picard was one of a small number of nationally prominent researchers, out of 514 scientists and engineers, whose names appeared on the Discovery Institute's controversial petition, "A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism".

Bibliography

Affective Computing, Rosalind Picard, (MIT Press, 1997)
T.P. Minka and R.W. Picard (1997), "Interactive Learning Using a 'Society of Models,'" Pattern Recognition, Volume 30, No. 4, pp. 565-581, 1997. (Winner of 1997 Pattern Recognition Society Award)
B. Kort, R. Reilly and R.W. Picard (2001), "An Affective Model of Interplay Between Emotions and Learning: Reengineering Educational Pedagogy-Building a Learning Companion," In Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2001), August 2001, Madison, WI. (Winner of Best Paper Prize.)

References

External links

Categories: