| Revision as of 02:28, 19 December 2007 editJohnbod (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Rollbackers280,312 edits reply | Revision as of 02:48, 19 December 2007 edit undo218.44.36.154 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| I've deleted it once (that I can remember) but I'll be delighted to delete it again. Actually I added two links to other articles (none for the huge porn section), but it isn't right for art history, especially jammed to the top of the list. Cheers ] (]) 02:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC) | I've deleted it once (that I can remember) but I'll be delighted to delete it again. Actually I added two links to other articles (none for the huge porn section), but it isn't right for art history, especially jammed to the top of the list. Cheers ] (]) 02:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| What porn section are you talking about ? | |||
| Please visit the site and see for yourself whether it is good for the art history or not. The site is huge and is used by thousands of people around the world. It contains the most comprehensive art history coverage than anything else on the web. | |||
| Who are in charge here to solve disputes ? You obviously can't be trusted. | |||
Revision as of 02:48, 19 December 2007
I've deleted it once (that I can remember) but I'll be delighted to delete it again. Actually I added two links to other articles (none for the huge porn section), but it isn't right for art history, especially jammed to the top of the list. Cheers Johnbod (talk) 02:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
What porn section are you talking about ? Please visit the site and see for yourself whether it is good for the art history or not. The site is huge and is used by thousands of people around the world. It contains the most comprehensive art history coverage than anything else on the web. Who are in charge here to solve disputes ? You obviously can't be trusted.