Misplaced Pages

Talk:Da Costa's syndrome: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:16, 21 December 2007 editGordonofcartoon (talk | contribs)7,228 edits →Banfield: add sig / agreed about COI← Previous edit Revision as of 02:20, 21 December 2007 edit undoGordonofcartoon (talk | contribs)7,228 edits →BanfieldNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
==Banfield== ==Banfield==
The section on "posture" isn't working for me. Nobody outside of the The theory looks like it was created by a non-medical person who is trying to reinvent the wheel -- the "wheel" being garden variety ] and ]. I'd like to remove the last few paragraphs of the "History" section, beginning from the words "From 1982-1983..." Does anyone here -- that is, anyone here except Banfield, who has a clear ] in judging the merits and notability of his own work -- object? ] 01:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC) The section on "posture" isn't working for me. Nobody outside of the The theory looks like it was created by a non-medical person who is trying to reinvent the wheel -- the "wheel" being garden variety ] and ]. I'd like to remove the last few paragraphs of the "History" section, beginning from the words "From 1982-1983..." Does anyone here -- that is, anyone here except Banfield, who has a clear ] in judging the merits and notability of his own work -- object? ] 01:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
:No objection here. I agree about the COI of his expounding anything to do with his own theory in this article, and have posted a note to that effect at ]. If necessary, it can go to ]. ] (]) 02:16, 21 December 2007 (UTC) :No objection here. Nothing I can find in real medical literature sugests it merits such ], and I agree about the COI of his expounding anything to do with his own theory in this article. I've posted a note to that effect at ]; if necessary, it can go to ]. ] (]) 02:16, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:20, 21 December 2007

WikiProject iconMedicine Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Remade the article - No copyright material this time.

Banfield

The section on "posture" isn't working for me. Nobody outside of the The theory looks like it was created by a non-medical person who is trying to reinvent the wheel -- the "wheel" being garden variety orthostatic intolerance and hyperventilation syndrome. I'd like to remove the last few paragraphs of the "History" section, beginning from the words "From 1982-1983..." Does anyone here -- that is, anyone here except Banfield, who has a clear conflict of interest in judging the merits and notability of his own work -- object? WhatamIdoing 01:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

No objection here. Nothing I can find in real medical literature sugests it merits such undue space, and I agree about the COI of his expounding anything to do with his own theory in this article. I've posted a note to that effect at User talk:Posturewriter; if necessary, it can go to WP:COI/N. Gordonofcartoon (talk) 02:16, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Categories: