| Revision as of 23:50, 26 December 2007 editAnmaFinotera (talk | contribs)107,494 editsm Reverted 1 edit by 79.74.108.197 identified as vandalism to last revision by Collectonian. using TW← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:11, 27 December 2007 edit undoCBFan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,099 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :{{la|Uka Uka}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Uka Uka}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| Unnotable video game character with no real-world significance. Article is almost entirely game plot regurgitation, Original research "supported" by a glut of game quotes. Tagged as such and suggested merge to ]. Tagging was labeled vandalism. On closer inspect, the list of character covers this one adequately enough, so merge is probably not needed anyway. ] (]) 19:58, 26 December 2007 (UTC) | Unnotable video game character with no real-world significance. Article is almost entirely game plot regurgitation, Original research "supported" by a glut of game quotes. Tagged as such and suggested merge to ]. Tagging was labeled vandalism. On closer inspect, the list of character covers this one adequately enough, so merge is probably not needed anyway. ] (]) 19:58, 26 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| : '''Keep''' - There are absolutly no legimate reasons provided above as to why the article should be deleted, and it easily promotes biasey as this could be said for every single fictional character in existance, video game or otherwise. Plus, he clearly meets the criteria set out for having an article. ] (]) 11:11, 27 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:11, 27 December 2007
Uka Uka
Unnotable video game character with no real-world significance. Article is almost entirely game plot regurgitation, Original research "supported" by a glut of game quotes. Tagged as such and suggested merge to List of Crash Bandicoot characters. Tagging was labeled vandalism. On closer inspect, the list of character covers this one adequately enough, so merge is probably not needed anyway. Collectonian (talk) 19:58, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - There are absolutly no legimate reasons provided above as to why the article should be deleted, and it easily promotes biasey as this could be said for every single fictional character in existance, video game or otherwise. Plus, he clearly meets the criteria set out for having an article. CBFan (talk) 11:11, 27 December 2007 (UTC)