| Revision as of 15:03, 27 December 2007 editGundamsRus (talk | contribs)752 edits →Living Greyhawk Gazetteer← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:16, 27 December 2007 edit undoRogueNinja (talk | contribs)1,788 edits →Living Greyhawk Gazetteer: commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| ::*'''comment''' Do you have any evidence to support this ] that appears to be a violation of WP ]? ] (]) 15:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC) | ::*'''comment''' Do you have any evidence to support this ] that appears to be a violation of WP ]? ] (]) 15:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :::*'''comment''' Going through his edits, I find that he votes keep on every AFD, and also makes frequent uncivil claims. <font color="navy">]</font><i><sub><font color="forestgreen" >]</font></sub></i> 17:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:16, 27 December 2007
Living Greyhawk Gazetteer
- Living Greyhawk Gazetteer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable game guide. No reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability outside of D&D publications. Gavin Collins (talk) 22:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions. --Gavin Collins (talk) 22:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep has independent reviews the equivalent of most gaming material, whether RPGs or computer games. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Nom did not read the article before nominating it. Jtrainor (talk) 13:35, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- comment Do you have any evidence to support this uncivil claim that appears to be a violation of WP guideline for assuming good faith? GundamsRus (talk) 15:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- comment Going through his edits, I find that he votes keep on every AFD, and also makes frequent uncivil claims. RogueNinjatalk 17:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)