| Revision as of 19:12, 27 December 2007 editJtrainor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,011 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:00, 27 December 2007 edit undoRogueNinja (talk | contribs)1,788 editsm →Living Greyhawk GazetteerNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| :::*'''comment''' Going through his edits, I find that he votes keep on every AFD, and also makes frequent uncivil claims. <font color="navy">]</font><i><sub><font color="forestgreen" >]</font></sub></i> 17:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC) | :::*'''comment''' Going through his edits, I find that he votes keep on every AFD, and also makes frequent uncivil claims. <font color="navy">]</font><i><sub><font color="forestgreen" >]</font></sub></i> 17:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Stop ]ing me, GundamsRus. I will not argue anything with a disruptive sock puppet. RogueNinja, I know full well you havn't actually looked, because your claim is demonstrably false. I'm not even going to debate it with you as the closing admin is quite capable of clicking my contribs button themselves. ] (]) 19:12, 27 December 2007 (UTC) | ::::Stop ]ing me, GundamsRus. I will not argue anything with a disruptive sock puppet. RogueNinja, I know full well you havn't actually looked, because your claim is demonstrably false. I'm not even going to debate it with you as the closing admin is quite capable of clicking my contribs button themselves. ] (]) 19:12, 27 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::::*'''comment''' I have indeed looked through your contributions. I urge any admins that you bring into this to do the same. <font color="navy">]</font><i><sub><font color="forestgreen" >]</font></sub></i> 20:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:00, 27 December 2007
Living Greyhawk Gazetteer
- Living Greyhawk Gazetteer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable game guide. No reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability outside of D&D publications. Gavin Collins (talk) 22:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions. --Gavin Collins (talk) 22:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep has independent reviews the equivalent of most gaming material, whether RPGs or computer games. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Nom did not read the article before nominating it. Jtrainor (talk) 13:35, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- comment Do you have any evidence to support this uncivil claim that appears to be a violation of WP guideline for assuming good faith? GundamsRus (talk) 15:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- comment Going through his edits, I find that he votes keep on every AFD, and also makes frequent uncivil claims. RogueNinjatalk 17:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Stop WP:STALKing me, GundamsRus. I will not argue anything with a disruptive sock puppet. RogueNinja, I know full well you havn't actually looked, because your claim is demonstrably false. I'm not even going to debate it with you as the closing admin is quite capable of clicking my contribs button themselves. Jtrainor (talk) 19:12, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- comment I have indeed looked through your contributions. I urge any admins that you bring into this to do the same. RogueNinjatalk 20:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)