Revision as of 22:12, 31 December 2007 view sourceMoreschi (talk | contribs)19,434 edits →Article probation: agreed← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:06, 1 January 2008 view source JzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,070 edits →Rollback: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Can this please be extended to, at the very least, ]? Both these articles would be better than one, in my opinion. ] ] 22:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC) | Can this please be extended to, at the very least, ]? Both these articles would be better than one, in my opinion. ] ] 22:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Aye. ] <sup> ]</sup> 22:12, 31 December 2007 (UTC) | :Aye. ] <sup> ]</sup> 22:12, 31 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Rollback == | |||
Rollback is now to be made available to non-admins, is already available to non-admins through Twinkle, and can also be accessed via the inbuilt Undo function. I don't think use of rollback is such a big deal these days. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 10:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:06, 1 January 2008
Arbitrators active on this case
- To update this listing, edit this template and scroll down until you find the right list of arbitrators. If updates to this listing do not immediately show, try purging the cache.
Article probation
Can this please be extended to, at the very least, Race of ancient Egyptians? Both these articles would be better than one, in my opinion. Picaroon (t) 22:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Rollback
Rollback is now to be made available to non-admins, is already available to non-admins through Twinkle, and can also be accessed via the inbuilt Undo function. I don't think use of rollback is such a big deal these days. Guy (Help!) 10:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)