Misplaced Pages

:Deletion review/Log/2008 January 2: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Deletion review | Log Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:38, 2 January 2008 editNLovelle (talk | contribs)44 edits →Daniel DiCriscio← Previous edit Revision as of 04:02, 2 January 2008 edit undoSmashville (talk | contribs)10,619 edits →Daniel DiCriscioNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:
This article was in fact deleted earlier this year. The reason being that there were to many photos and that the article wasn't properly referenced. This article was created again with the proper references and with only one photo that is owned by the subject. This article is of a well known person who is of importance and who is also a public figure. Every fact in this article is notable and has been proven. The speedy deletion this time is not a question of the importance of this person or by the way the article was written, but what seems to be the targeting of this person by people who do in fact know who he is and do not want him to have a Misplaced Pages page. This article was in fact deleted earlier this year. The reason being that there were to many photos and that the article wasn't properly referenced. This article was created again with the proper references and with only one photo that is owned by the subject. This article is of a well known person who is of importance and who is also a public figure. Every fact in this article is notable and has been proven. The speedy deletion this time is not a question of the importance of this person or by the way the article was written, but what seems to be the targeting of this person by people who do in fact know who he is and do not want him to have a Misplaced Pages page.
I would like to request that this article is reposted and protected. I would like to request that this article is reposted and protected.
] (]) 03:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC) ] (]) 03:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
*Actually, from what I see in the AfD, it didn't seem like there were nontrivial sources. What has he done to make himself notable and a public figure since the AfD? --]] 04:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:02, 2 January 2008

< January 1 Deletion review archives: 2008 January January 3 >

2 January 2008

Daniel DiCriscio

Daniel DiCriscio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|cache|AfD)

This article was in fact deleted earlier this year. The reason being that there were to many photos and that the article wasn't properly referenced. This article was created again with the proper references and with only one photo that is owned by the subject. This article is of a well known person who is of importance and who is also a public figure. Every fact in this article is notable and has been proven. The speedy deletion this time is not a question of the importance of this person or by the way the article was written, but what seems to be the targeting of this person by people who do in fact know who he is and do not want him to have a Misplaced Pages page. I would like to request that this article is reposted and protected. NLovelle (talk) 03:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Actually, from what I see in the AfD, it didn't seem like there were nontrivial sources. What has he done to make himself notable and a public figure since the AfD? --Smashville 04:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)