| Revision as of 06:32, 2 January 2008 editSmashville (talk | contribs)10,619 edits →User talk:202.76.162.34← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:42, 2 January 2008 edit undo58.168.147.119 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| ] (]) 05:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC) --> | ] (]) 05:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC) --> | ||
| *Why do you "want" them? You're going to have to explain further. It doesn't seem like there's much of interest from the page other than it being a blocked user. --]] 06:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC) | *Why do you "want" them? You're going to have to explain further. It doesn't seem like there's much of interest from the page other than it being a blocked user. --]] 06:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| **I want them because people who are not interested in contributions may need to know what this IP has done in the past. ] (]) 08:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ====]==== | ====]==== | ||
Revision as of 08:42, 2 January 2008
| < January 1 | Deletion review archives: 2008 January | January 3 > |
|---|
2 January 2008
User talk:202.76.162.34
- User talk:202.76.162.34 (edit | ] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|cache|AfD)
I want the old comments from this talk page back. I have created an archive of these discussions several times, but it was deleted without a good reason. Please bring this back. 58.168.147.119 (talk) 05:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC) -->
- Why do you "want" them? You're going to have to explain further. It doesn't seem like there's much of interest from the page other than it being a blocked user. --Smashville 06:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- I want them because people who are not interested in contributions may need to know what this IP has done in the past. 58.168.147.119 (talk) 08:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Daniel DiCriscio
- Daniel DiCriscio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|cache|AfD)
This article was in fact deleted earlier this year. The reason being that there were to many photos and that the article wasn't properly referenced. This article was created again with the proper references and with only one photo that is owned by the subject. This article is of a well known person who is of importance and who is also a public figure. Every fact in this article is notable and has been proven. The speedy deletion this time is not a question of the importance of this person or by the way the article was written, but what seems to be the targeting of this person by people who do in fact know who he is and do not want him to have a Misplaced Pages page. I would like to request that this article is reposted and protected. NLovelle (talk) 03:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, from what I see in the AfD, it didn't seem like there were nontrivial sources. What has he done to make himself notable and a public figure since the AfD? --Smashville 04:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)