| Revision as of 08:50, 2 January 2008 editCharles Matthews (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators360,213 editsm →Works← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:51, 2 January 2008 edit undoCharles Matthews (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators360,213 edits →Works: supply full nameNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ==Works== | ==Works== | ||
| ]<ref>Ep. Lxx</ref> names Titus among writers whose secular erudition is as marvellous as their knowledge of Scripture; in his "De vir. ill.", cii, he speaks of his "mighty" (fortes) books against the ] and nonnulla alia. He places his death under ]. Of the nonnulla alia only fragments of exegetical writings have survived. These show that Titus followed the Antiochene School of Scripture exegesis in keeping to the literal as opposed to the allegorical interpretation. The ''Contra Manichæos'' is the most important work of the kind that has come down to us, of value is because of the number of quotations it contains from Manichaean writers. In one passage Titus seems to favour ]'s view that the pains of the damned are not eternal<ref>On this point see especially ], "Histoire générale des auteurs sacrés et ecclésiastiques", VI p. 54, who seems disposed to acquit him of this error.</ref>. The work consists of four books of which the fourth and the greater part of the third are only extant in a ] translation. | ]<ref>Ep. Lxx</ref> names Titus among writers whose secular erudition is as marvellous as their knowledge of Scripture; in his "De vir. ill.", cii, he speaks of his "mighty" (fortes) books against the ] and nonnulla alia. He places his death under ]. Of the nonnulla alia only fragments of exegetical writings have survived. These show that Titus followed the Antiochene School of Scripture exegesis in keeping to the literal as opposed to the allegorical interpretation. The ''Contra Manichæos'' is the most important work of the kind that has come down to us, of value is because of the number of quotations it contains from Manichaean writers. In one passage Titus seems to favour ]'s view that the pains of the damned are not eternal<ref>On this point see especially ], "Histoire générale des auteurs sacrés et ecclésiastiques", VI p. 54, who seems disposed to acquit him of this error.</ref>. The work consists of four books of which the fourth and the greater part of the third are only extant in a ] translation. | ||
| The Greek and Syriac texts of the Contra Manichæos. were published by Lagarde (Berlin, 1859). Earlier editions of the Greek text suffer from an insertion from a work of Serapion owing to the misplacement of a leaf in the original codex. For this. and other writings attributed to Titus see ] and ]. The genuine exegetical fragments of this commentary were published by ] in Texte u. Untersuchen, VI, i (new series). Bardenhewer-Shahan, Patrology (St. Louis, 1908), 270-1. | The Greek and Syriac texts of the Contra Manichæos. were published by Lagarde (Berlin, 1859). Earlier editions of the Greek text suffer from an insertion from a work of Serapion owing to the misplacement of a leaf in the original codex. For this. and other writings attributed to Titus see ] and ]. The genuine exegetical fragments of this commentary were published by ] in Texte u. Untersuchen, VI, i (new series). Bardenhewer-Shahan, Patrology (St. Louis, 1908), 270-1. | ||
Revision as of 08:51, 2 January 2008
Titus of Bostra (Bosra, now in Syria) (died c.378) was a Catholic theologian and bishop. Sozomen names Titus among the great men of the time of Constantius.
Life
Sozomen also tells of a trick played upon Titus by Julian the Apostate. Julian wrote to Titus, as bishop of Bostra that he would hold him and the clergy responsible for any disorder after the re-establishment of paganism. Titus replied that though the Christians were equal in number to the pagans they would obey him and keep quiet. Julian then wrote to the Bostrians urging them to expel Titus because he had calumniated them by attributing their quiet conduct not to their own good dispositions but to his influence. Titus remained bishop at Bostra until c. 371.
According to Socrates Titus was one of the bishops who signed the Synodal Letter, addressed to Jovian by the Council of Antioch (363), in which the Nicene Creed was accepted, though with a clause "intended somewhat to weaken and semiarianize the expression homoousios".
Works
St. Jerome names Titus among writers whose secular erudition is as marvellous as their knowledge of Scripture; in his "De vir. ill.", cii, he speaks of his "mighty" (fortes) books against the Manichaean and nonnulla alia. He places his death under Valens. Of the nonnulla alia only fragments of exegetical writings have survived. These show that Titus followed the Antiochene School of Scripture exegesis in keeping to the literal as opposed to the allegorical interpretation. The Contra Manichæos is the most important work of the kind that has come down to us, of value is because of the number of quotations it contains from Manichaean writers. In one passage Titus seems to favour Origen's view that the pains of the damned are not eternal. The work consists of four books of which the fourth and the greater part of the third are only extant in a Syriac translation.
The Greek and Syriac texts of the Contra Manichæos. were published by Lagarde (Berlin, 1859). Earlier editions of the Greek text suffer from an insertion from a work of Serapion owing to the misplacement of a leaf in the original codex. For this. and other writings attributed to Titus see Migne and Gallandi. The genuine exegetical fragments of this commentary were published by Sickenberger in Texte u. Untersuchen, VI, i (new series). Bardenhewer-Shahan, Patrology (St. Louis, 1908), 270-1.
References
- P. G. Walsh, James Walsh (1985), Divine Providence and Human Suffering, p. 53 et seq.
- Nils Arne Pedersen (2004), Demonstrative proof in defence of God. A study of Titus of Bostra's Contra Manichaeos - The work's sources, aims and relation to its contemporary theology
Notes
- Hist. eccl., III, xiv.
- op. cit., V, xv.
- Samuel N. C. Lieu, Manichaeism in the Later Roman Empire and Medieval China (1992), p. 132.
- op. cit., III, xxv.
- Hefele, "Councils", II, p. 283.
- Ep. Lxx
- On this point see especially Rémy Ceillier, "Histoire générale des auteurs sacrés et ecclésiastiques", VI p. 54, who seems disposed to acquit him of this error.
This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)