Misplaced Pages

Talk:Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:23, 4 January 2008 editAitias (talk | contribs)Rollbackers50,076 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 19:20, 20 January 2008 edit undoDGG (talk | contribs)316,874 edits meaningNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:


''Where'' do you think doesen't the given reference “''Reclams kleines Zitaten-Lexikon''”, Author: Muriel Kasper, page 108, Reclam, ISBN support the “opinion”? Sorry, but it '''clearly does'''. Regards, —] ''•'']''•'' 03:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC) ''Where'' do you think doesen't the given reference “''Reclams kleines Zitaten-Lexikon''”, Author: Muriel Kasper, page 108, Reclam, ISBN support the “opinion”? Sorry, but it '''clearly does'''. Regards, —] ''•'']''•'' 03:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
::I do not think it justifies the use of the term in an English language context in that meaning. I do not even think it justifies that this is the general German language context. In fact, I think it is either a misunderstanding or a deliberate use in an opposite meaning; given the high quality of German legal scholarship, I susppect the later. ''']''' (]) 19:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:20, 20 January 2008

The references do not support the text in my opinion. Nor is the translation into English idiomatic. The meaning seems rather to be that one must do justice, regardless f temporal considerations. An ironical meaning is asserted, but without support. DGG (talk) 22:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Where do you think doesen't the given reference “Reclams kleines Zitaten-Lexikon”, Author: Muriel Kasper, page 108, Reclam, ISBN 3-15-010478-5 support the “opinion”? Sorry, but it clearly does. Regards, —αἰτίας discussion 03:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

I do not think it justifies the use of the term in an English language context in that meaning. I do not even think it justifies that this is the general German language context. In fact, I think it is either a misunderstanding or a deliberate use in an opposite meaning; given the high quality of German legal scholarship, I susppect the later. DGG (talk) 19:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)