| Revision as of 22:05, 7 January 2008 editPenwhale (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users7,574 edits Fix← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:38, 19 January 2008 edit undoSirFozzie (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,149 edits Request for guidanceNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{ACA|Bluemarine=yes}} | {{ACA|Bluemarine=yes}} | ||
| ==Request for guidance== | |||
| I recently closed the 3rd AfD debate for this article, ] Per that, the consensus of the decision was both to keep the article, but alleviate BLP concerns, by taking a hard look at the sources involved, and make sure the article complies with ]. When I attempted to do this (full admission, the article is fully protected), I was convinced to self-revert, as I was told that this fell under the perview of the ArbCom. Can ArbCom please provide guidance on how best to implement the AfD consensus? Thank you. ] (]) 05:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:38, 19 January 2008
Arbitrators active on this case
- To update this listing, edit this template and scroll down until you find the right list of arbitrators. If updates to this listing do not immediately show, try purging the cache.
Request for guidance
I recently closed the 3rd AfD debate for this article, Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Matt Sanchez (3rd nomination) Per that, the consensus of the decision was both to keep the article, but alleviate BLP concerns, by taking a hard look at the sources involved, and make sure the article complies with WP:BLP. When I attempted to do this (full admission, the article is fully protected), I was convinced to self-revert, as I was told that this fell under the perview of the ArbCom. Can ArbCom please provide guidance on how best to implement the AfD consensus? Thank you. SirFozzie (talk) 05:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC)