Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 08:13, 10 January 2008

Before you bring up a new discussion, please look at the archives. Discussions on Title Cards and Episode Articles are continuously brought up. These have been discussed and you can follow the link to help the pages out. Thank You.

Template:WikiProjectSpongeBobSquarePants Template:Wikiproject Nickelodeon Template:Reqscreenshot

List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes received a peer review by Misplaced Pages editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 January, 2007 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Talk:List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes/Archives

Help Improve the episode articles

In order to have the episode articles back, they need to be improved. The episodes will be improved one by one, starting with the pilot episode. Go to Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_SpongeBob_SquarePants/Episode_Improvement to improve the pilot episode

Peer Review

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.
• Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style (links) and WP:CONTEXT.
• See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.
• There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City. (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
• Per Misplaced Pages:Context and Misplaced Pages:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.
• As per Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style (headings), please do not link words in headings.
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Misplaced Pages's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AMK152 20:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Pest in the West

A recent commercial has begun appearing on Nickelodeon promoting their new events for 2008. Along with several other specials / shows, a "Wild West" version of SpongeBob is shown called "Pest in the West". Should we add some note of this? Setherex (talk) 19:09, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Don't add it unless you can find a source. Unfortunately, "I saw it on TV" is not a source; it actually violates WP:NOR. Try Animation Insider, TV.com, or TV Guide; even being listed at one of these sources is acceptable because it confirms the title. NF24 21:25, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

A little suggestion

This is just a suggestion, but how about this article be merged into Spongebob Squarepants article? what do u think? (Gotiger13 (talk) 09:35, 16 December 2007 (UTC))

Nope. It would make an already long article even longer. NF24 13:08, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

So? making it longer is good! y'see, if this was merged into the Spongebob Squarepants article, it would be better. You might disagree, but other people will agree. (Gotiger13 (talk) 15:04, 16 December 2007 (UTC))

To the contrary - longer articles are harder to edit and cause problems on older computers. Still, we'll see if others agree. NF24 16:22, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Nope. A straight disagreeing from me. I mean look at SpongeBob SquarePants article. It's already as long as hell and with mostly nothing productive and with 9 refs for 42 kb of prose. Adding the ENTIRE list is gonna make the article even more of an eye sore. (SUDUSER)₈₅ 06:47, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

No it won't. It will improve the Spongebob Squarepants article a lot. I think that this article should be in the Spongebob Squarepants article. (Gotiger13 (talk) 07:27, 17 December 2007 (UTC))

I agree with Gotiger13. It would be best for this article. As for people saying Spongebob Squarepants is as long as hell, go and look at Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows and say that again.

Gotiger 13, i agree with you! (Shadowmoon13 (talk) 17:11, 17 December 2007 (UTC))

Pointing out other articles is not a valid defense. NewYork483 (talk) 03:37, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't agree with this. I think we should just have the small link in there as usual. (PhilipB (talk) 17:06, 17 December 2007 (GMT)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.175.45 (talk)

Look at other TV show articles like The Simpsons and Buffy the Vampire Slayer (TV series); all these articles have seperate episode lists - so that's the norm; Find me one TV show article that does what you are suggesting! (SUDUSER)₈₅ 13:33, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Merging with the main article is a very bad idea. -AMK152 22:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Merging the list of episodes into the show is a bad idea. the show has five seasons worth of episodes, each at least somewhat notable and they could not all be summarized in the show's page. Frank Anchor, U. S. American (talk) 04:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

I have a better idea! Add links to the Seasons in the Spongebob Squarepants article! (Gotiger13 (talk) 14:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC))

That is a worser idea. And i cannot disagree with you SUDUSER i have looked through some of those articles and it seems that you are right. So now i think it is best to keep it how it is for now. (Shadowmoon13 (talk) 15:41, 23 December 2007 (UTC))

I really do agree with everything that people have said. I think that the List of spongebob Squarepants episodes should stay how they are. (Sazuref (talk) 16:27, 23 December 2007 (UTC))

Welcome to wikipedia, Sazuref. But can i point out something? your spelling is bad, and i really does agree does not make sense. I corrected your spelling. Please watch in the future. (Shadowmoon13 (talk) 16:33, 23 December 2007 (UTC))

I am very sory Shadowmoon13, but i am not got at Spaelling at all. (Sazuref (talk) 16:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC))

I can see that. Just try to improve. (Shadowmoon13 (talk) 16:37, 23 December 2007 (UTC))

Besides The Greeting & Spelling To Sazuref. I Disagree It's Not Very Huge Article Like The Spongebob Squarepants One. It's Just A Little Shorter.CartoonSpot121 (talk) 02:09, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

I have a good idea! Delete the whole article! it sucks! (Gralou (talk) 12:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC))

See Misplaced Pages:Articles for Deletion, though "This article sucks" is hardly a reason for deletion. NF24 12:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

The UK release dates are not in there! thats why it sucks. (Gralou (talk) 12:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC))

Oh. Well, if you really want to, go ahead and add them. Don't be surprised if you get reverted, though. (I honestly don't have a problem with releases in one other country, but this article has a tendency to grow rather large in a short amount of time and others might not welcome your changes.) NF24 12:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Its all about the US isn't it? to improve the article YOU need to add all the air dates of all the countrys. YOU act like the boss of the article, so i command you to do that NOW. (Gralou (talk) 12:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC))

Commanding people will get you nowhere in life or Misplaced Pages (except a block). NF24 19:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Gralou, you are not the boss of anybody. Anyway, i disagree. The list of spongebob episode article should stay how it is. (Elliott the king (talk) 18:09, 5 January 2008 (UTC))

Putting UK release dates would get crowed. Next thign yo uknow we woudl need Australia dates and Germany dates, etc. As the show began in the US, the US dates are more appropriate for the US. Besides, the SpongeBob SquarePants Wikia already has a list of US dates, as well as a start for Australian dates. It is more appropriate to put foreign airdates there than Misplaced Pages. -AMK152 00:56, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Please

Please take the protection off, i know that some users vandalise the page, but its not fair on others that want to edit the article. (Elliott the king (talk) 18:37, 5 January 2008 (UTC))

You are registered, so wait until your account if four days old ("autoconfirmed" in wiki-lingo) and you will be able to edit. Unregistered (IP address) users were making a mess of things, so the article got semi-protected indefinitely. NF24 20:30, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

"Le Big Switch?"

I haven't heard of this episode. Is it real? --63.246.240.181 (talk) 18:03, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it certainly is. I saw it on the TV last week, so it is real. (Elliott the king (talk) 19:46, 9 January 2008 (UTC))

Search for evidence. Tis the only thing you can do, altho you could also talk to somebody about it and ask them. (Sneasel99 (talk) 20:01, 9 January 2008 (UTC))

Try TV.com for starters. NF24 20:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Teh website is pretty good. (Sneasel99 (talk) 08:13, 10 January 2008 (UTC))

• Old requests for peer review