| Revision as of 05:32, 11 January 2008 editQuoth nevermore~enwiki (talk | contribs)715 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:16, 11 January 2008 edit undoJames086 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,465 edits →Maria Lauterbach: comment and weak deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| '''Keep''' Deletion proposed by ], who gave the reason: "NN bio". This is a user that claims to be an administrator, although nobody knows that for sure. That user added a prod tag, although from the sources and references in the article it is clear that this is not an NN bio. I erased the prod tag, and added the afd tag. I don't want this article to be deleted, but I certainly don't want it to be deleted because of the prod tag without any discussions. ] (]) 04:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | '''Keep''' Deletion proposed by ], who gave the reason: "NN bio". This is a user that claims to be an administrator, although nobody knows that for sure. That user added a prod tag, although from the sources and references in the article it is clear that this is not an NN bio. I erased the prod tag, and added the afd tag. I don't want this article to be deleted, but I certainly don't want it to be deleted because of the prod tag without any discussions. ] (]) 04:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''' There was no need to create an AfD since the article has a PROD tag on it. But since the AfD has been removed, would it be acceptable to remove the PROD? ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]•])</sup> 04:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' There was no need to create an AfD since the article has a PROD tag on it. But since the AfD has been removed, would it be acceptable to remove the PROD? ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]•])</sup> 04:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''' ] is the account of ] for use when he is at work. <font face="comic sans ms" color="#454545">]</font><sup>] | ]</sup> 07:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Weak delete''' - While it has plenty of sources, it seems to be more of a news article than an encyclopedia article. See point 5 of ] and the second paragraph of ]. If this turns into a large controversy it should be kept however. <font face="comic sans ms" color="#454545">]</font><sup>] | ]</sup> 07:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:16, 11 January 2008
Maria Lauterbach
- Maria Lauterbach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Keep Deletion proposed by Arbeit Sockenpuppe, who gave the reason: "NN bio". This is a user that claims to be an administrator, although nobody knows that for sure. That user added a prod tag, although from the sources and references in the article it is clear that this is not an NN bio. I erased the prod tag, and added the afd tag. I don't want this article to be deleted, but I certainly don't want it to be deleted because of the prod tag without any discussions. Quoth nevermore (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment There was no need to create an AfD since the article has a PROD tag on it. But since the AfD has been removed, would it be acceptable to remove the PROD? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 04:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Arbeit Sockenpuppe is the account of User:Y for use when he is at work. James086 07:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Weak delete - While it has plenty of sources, it seems to be more of a news article than an encyclopedia article. See point 5 of WP:NOT#NEWS and the second paragraph of WP:N#TEMP. If this turns into a large controversy it should be kept however. James086 07:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)