| Revision as of 06:57, 12 January 2008 editOrangemarlin (talk | contribs)30,771 edits →Intelligent design edit: Sheesh, I guess I should blow him?← Previous edit |
Revision as of 06:58, 12 January 2008 edit undoOrangemarlin (talk | contribs)30,771 edits Archiving.Next edit → |
| Line 106: |
Line 106: |
|
:::You do know I was just joshing, right? ] (]) 01:19, 12 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
:::You do know I was just joshing, right? ] (]) 01:19, 12 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
::::We didn't know you had a sense of humor????? :) ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 01:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
::::We didn't know you had a sense of humor????? :) ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 01:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
==]== |
|
|
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. ] is instructed to refrain from making any comments to another user that could reasonably be construed as harassing, threatening, or bullying. Should Jim62sch make any comment that is or could reasonably be construed as of a harassing, threatening, or bullying nature, he may be blocked for an appropriate period of time by any uninvolved administrator. Any such action should be logged at ] and should also be reported to the Arbitration Committee. |
|
|
|
|
|
All involved editors are reminded of the prohibition against harassment and threats. Editors are also reminded that sensitivity should be shown in making any reference to another user's real-world circumstances in connection with their editing Misplaced Pages, even where this is done in good faith, due to the likelihood that such comments may be misconstrued. The Committee also asks that any incident of a user's engaging in grave acts of real-world harassment of another editor, such as communicating with an editor's employer in retaliation for his or her editing on Misplaced Pages, be reported to them immediately. |
|
|
|
|
|
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ''']''' 13:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== GA nom == |
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not trying to get some glory - just trying to help you, I've nominated many articles which I never edited at the GA and sometimes they passed, sometimes the reviewers found things to improve and the dedicated editors (or myself if it was easy) fixed them to pass. Misplaced Pages has so many badly done (or half-assed) articles that when a well-crafted one is found, it's not a bad thing to at least see if it passes the GA criteria. ] ] 17:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
:This article is in terrible shape. It lacks references for some of the information, it is not constructed correctly, and over half the article discusses something other than the extinction event. you didn't ask anyone's opinion if it was ready for GA. I've brought one extinction event article to FA, and I can tell you this one is not worthy of much right now. I've probably edited it over 100 times, and I still don't like it. ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 20:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Intelligent design edit== |
|
|
Could you explain how the edit is POV? I'm describing someone else's position, so...? I think the relationship between intelligent design and other forms of creationism is an interesting matter not dealt with in the article, and Dennett's quote on the interaction between ID and YEC is elucidating. ] (]) 06:38, 12 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
:No it's not. Take it to the Discussion section of ID, not here. ID is an FA, and as such, major changes require input from all editors. Moreover, try reading ] before creating sloppy citations. ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 06:39, 12 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
::Alright then... at least I'll be likely to get a more civil response... ] (]) |
|
|
:::You come to my page with Creationist POV, and you expect me to be nice? Sorry, no. ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 06:57, 12 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
Below are articles articles, mostly medical but some in the sciences, that promote ideas or POV's that might endanger human life. Feel free to add your own, but I'm watching and cleaning up these articles. Please sign if you add something.
Hi, I think i saw some back 'n forth between you 'n Sandy 'n Colin about tools for checking references... I would be very interested in learning anything you've learned (both now & in the future). Thanks! Ling.Nut (talk) 01:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
