| Revision as of 16:48, 9 July 2005 editSpatfield (talk | contribs)16 edits VFD entry | Revision as of 18:02, 9 July 2005 edit undoDcarrano (talk | contribs)1,354 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| I find this article to be POV and it's very premise is non-sensical to me, Anti-polygamy does not sound like a good title for a "debate" on polygamy. Furthermore, no other pages currently link to it. ] July 9, 2005 16:48 (UTC) | I find this article to be POV and it's very premise is non-sensical to me, Anti-polygamy does not sound like a good title for a "debate" on polygamy. Furthermore, no other pages currently link to it. ] July 9, 2005 16:48 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''; I would have said merge with ], except that the article really says nothing at all so there wouldn't be any point. ] July 9, 2005 18:02 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:02, 9 July 2005
Anti-polygamy
I find this article to be POV and it's very premise is non-sensical to me, Anti-polygamy does not sound like a good title for a "debate" on polygamy. Furthermore, no other pages currently link to it. spatfield July 9, 2005 16:48 (UTC)