| Revision as of 10:14, 17 January 2008 editMasterpiece2000 (talk | contribs)13,003 edits →Pig mask: Delete.← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:18, 17 January 2008 edit undoCyberGhostface (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users24,151 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| *'''Comment'''there's now a section on impact ect...not that it matters really it'll still go ] (]) 01:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC) | *'''Comment'''there's now a section on impact ect...not that it matters really it'll still go ] (]) 01:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom. ] (]) 10:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom. ] (]) 10:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *''Comment''' Y'know, when Hoffman's article was deleted, most of the people wanted it to be kept, but this was ignored because according to the deleting admin it was just "I like it". I wonder if most of the delete comments are going to be variations of "Per nom" if thats going to be taken into consideration.--] (]) 14:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:18, 17 January 2008
Pig mask
Delete - fails WP:NOT#PLOT as a mere rehash of the appearances of the prop in the film series. The mask may be important within the series but there appear not to be reliable sources that establish any real-world notability. Otto4711 (talk) 20:53, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep This "keep" probably won't mean anything considering how the mods deleted Hoffman's article, but in addition to being significant in all four films, the pig mask has also been sold as halloween mask, a number of action figures and models, and has been the subject of a number of promotional posters. The article does need work, but that doesn't mean we should all be delete-happy and get rid of it. (BTW, are you on some quest to rid Misplaced Pages of every Saw-related article or something??) --CyberGhostface (talk) 21:59, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- keep same as above though the vote will mean nothing because unless you have a shed-load of guidlines and policies to quote your vote doesn't count. An iconic part of the Saw series that needs a little work. Agent452 (talk) 00:04, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No evidence of real-world notability; I appreciate that precedent isn't decisive at AfD, but Jason Voorhees' mask is a far more iconic image, and it only warrants a passing mention in the hockey mask article. Tevildo (talk) 23:21, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Balance per notability concerns above. --Revanche (talk) 01:40, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Commentthere's now a section on impact ect...not that it matters really it'll still go Agent452 (talk) 01:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 10:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment' Y'know, when Hoffman's article was deleted, most of the people wanted it to be kept, but this was ignored because according to the deleting admin it was just "I like it". I wonder if most of the delete comments are going to be variations of "Per nom" if thats going to be taken into consideration.--CyberGhostface (talk) 14:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)