| Revision as of 21:43, 20 January 2008 editNiteshift36 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers41,775 edits →double digits← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:35, 21 January 2008 edit undoXSG (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers4,691 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| You quoted when claiming the US has no more than 5 non-nuclear subs. Instead of just listing the number, I'd suggest adding this as a source to accompany the US' nuclear subs source.--]] 02:45, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | You quoted when claiming the US has no more than 5 non-nuclear subs. Instead of just listing the number, I'd suggest adding this as a source to accompany the US' nuclear subs source.--]] 02:45, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :I agree, actually, but it's hard to tell which of the other countries' subs are used for research/rescue, and which are used for military. Except maybe in the case of N. Korea, which I'm sure doesn't sure the 20 subs they have listed here for rescue/research missions, considering they have not nuclear technology employed yet.--]] 02:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC) | :I agree, actually, but it's hard to tell which of the other countries' subs are used for research/rescue, and which are used for military. Except maybe in the case of N. Korea, which I'm sure doesn't sure the 20 subs they have listed here for rescue/research missions, considering they have not nuclear technology employed yet.--]] 02:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Paul inflammatory comments == | |||
| It was evident that your comments were not constructive nor conducive toward creating a better article. They were written to be inflammatory, which would only serve to escalate the debate and raise ire. If you feel the need to state your opinion in an article's talk page, it is my opinion that you should do so in a manner that is constructive toward the article in question, perhaps by suggesting that the article is POV and should be modified toward an NPOV tone. If you choose to disregard this, I will solicit an admin who concurs with my opinion and request the admin to take action. Misplaced Pages is not the place for spewing personal opinion to incite others' ire. '''—]]]''' 20:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:35, 21 January 2008
   | This user is a member of WikiProject Firearms. |
|
This user believes that a user's edit count does not necessarily reflect on the value of their contributions to Misplaced Pages. |
US Subs
You quoted Hazegray.org when claiming the US has no more than 5 non-nuclear subs. Instead of just listing the number, I'd suggest adding this as a source to accompany the US' nuclear subs source.--DMCer™ 02:45, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, actually, but it's hard to tell which of the other countries' subs are used for research/rescue, and which are used for military. Except maybe in the case of N. Korea, which I'm sure doesn't sure the 20 subs they have listed here for rescue/research missions, considering they have not nuclear technology employed yet.--DMCer™ 02:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Paul inflammatory comments
It was evident that your comments were not constructive nor conducive toward creating a better article. They were written to be inflammatory, which would only serve to escalate the debate and raise ire. If you feel the need to state your opinion in an article's talk page, it is my opinion that you should do so in a manner that is constructive toward the article in question, perhaps by suggesting that the article is POV and should be modified toward an NPOV tone. If you choose to disregard this, I will solicit an admin who concurs with my opinion and request the admin to take action. Misplaced Pages is not the place for spewing personal opinion to incite others' ire. —XSG 20:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)