Misplaced Pages

User talk:SlimVirgin: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:08, 21 January 2008 editSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 edits got it, thanks← Previous edit Revision as of 21:26, 21 January 2008 edit undoMarskell (talk | contribs)22,422 edits →LEAD: new sectionNext edit →
Line 29: Line 29:
|} |}
<center>{{User:Tangotango/RfA Analysis/Report}}</center> <center>{{User:Tangotango/RfA Analysis/Report}}</center>

== LEAD ==

Well, ho hum, there's always going to be something I'd like you to comment on. Here is my grand take on LEAD: ]ered. I really have been watching LEAD since '05. It's my favourite. It's possibly the best guideline we've had (e.g., people cite it and take it seriously, while recognizing it's not strictly policy). Right now, it seems to be a good-faith, but angry single issue editor. ] (]) 21:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:26, 21 January 2008

File:Animalibrí.gif

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—Talk to my owner:Online

LEAD

Well, ho hum, there's always going to be something I'd like you to comment on. Here is my grand take on LEAD: Wikipedia_talk:Lead_section#Subject.2Farticle_considered. I really have been watching LEAD since '05. It's my favourite. It's possibly the best guideline we've had (e.g., people cite it and take it seriously, while recognizing it's not strictly policy). Right now, it seems to be a good-faith, but angry single issue editor. Marskell (talk) 21:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)