Revision as of 21:17, 29 November 2003 editTMC1221 (talk | contribs)649 editsm Wikify links← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:50, 2 December 2003 edit undoHalibutt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,067 editsm typoNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The ] support has, so far, worked excellently. It fixes one problem, and fixes it well, whilst allowing migration to more fancy systems such as ] in the future. | The ] support has, so far, worked excellently. It fixes one problem, and fixes it well, whilst allowing migration to more fancy systems such as ] in the future. | ||
It has been proposed on the mailing list that essentially the same technique used with TeX be used to implement embedded ] markup in articles, presumably in <pre><music> </music></pre> tags. This will then be able to be upgraded to generate music markup, ]s, ] ] files, et |
It has been proposed on the mailing list that essentially the same technique used with TeX be used to implement embedded ] markup in articles, presumably in <pre><music> </music></pre> tags. This will then be able to be upgraded to generate music markup, ]s, ] ] files, et caetera later on. | ||
This article is a placeholder for this discussion. | This article is a placeholder for this discussion. |
Revision as of 18:50, 2 December 2003
The Misplaced Pages:TeX markup support has, so far, worked excellently. It fixes one problem, and fixes it well, whilst allowing migration to more fancy systems such as MathML in the future.
It has been proposed on the mailing list that essentially the same technique used with TeX be used to implement embedded GNU LilyPond markup in articles, presumably in
<music> </music>
tags. This will then be able to be upgraded to generate music markup, MIDI files, Ogg Vorbis files, et caetera later on.
This article is a placeholder for this discussion.
See also: