Revision as of 23:05, 25 January 2008

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Vandalism is futile Please understand that this userpage is frequently vandalized, and vandalism is reverted pretty quickly. You will not accomplish anything by vandalizing Misplaced Pages. If you wish to try test editing, you may do so in our sandbox located at Misplaced Pages:Sandbox or create a test subpage by putting "/test" after your username and clicking "create page." Thanks

Contacting me

If you wish to contact me, the quickest and easiest way is to CLICK HERE.

If you have a question about a deleted article, please leave a message by CLICKING HERE. You can also appeal a deletion by clicking this link to Deletion Review and following the directions found there.

This user welcomes RFA thank spam.

Archives

Talk archives for 2006 and 2007

Messages

Back to Iamastabbingrobot

So, it seems the article of the book survived...too bad the same didn't happen to the author's. However, I still think Iamastabbingrobot should watch his tone when writing at Misplaced Pages. Victao lopes (talk) 00:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

You think that's bad? One time a user was editing his user page without logging in. I reverted the edits, thinking it was vandalism. He had a few choice words for me about that! Hopefully he will mellow a little. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 00:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Guidelines

Thaank you for the guidelines, These may require me to spot and solve other issues on articles. I am currently working on the articles that require cleanup from January 2006. If there were other problems, I would find a solution to them too. ThanksSnikSpot (talk) 02:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

U R Welcome. Cool. Dlohcierekim 02:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks very much for that. I'm actually 'Realiseyourdignity' but i've forgotten my password.

I think you guys don't realise what your're oing the internet was aoriigninally a weapon of war, and you are helping everyone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.91.33.130 (talk) 03:29, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about not signing in.

is the objectivity of the article ok? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Notpayingthepsychiatrist (talk • contribs) 02:37, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

U R welcome. I don't know. I've never read it. Dlohcierekim 02:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Admor of Nadvorna.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Admor of Nadvorna.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Catherine Lip

That's fine, it was a rambling article which didn't look very reliable, thanks for cleaning it up. Harland1 (/_c) 16:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

My pleasure. Dlohcierekim 17:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jenny Sparks.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jenny Sparks.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

RfA

Ooops! Bearian (talk) 18:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: "articles with quotes"

I've seen that you left a comment on my talk page about creating redirects with the article name in quotes, is that right? To the best of my knowledge, I only create redirects where say, a company or a TV show or anything in general which has an article with the title say, X is also known in other regions of the world as Y. As you said, it's highly improbable that anyone would search for articles with quotes, and you're right in speedily deleting them. I still don't completely understand what it is that you're talking about, could you leave an example by my talk page, so I may reply authoritatively? Thanks , so speaks rohith. 18:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Nope, I don't think I make such redirects. I do feel that they're highly improbable. I don't think that anyone would search for an article in quotes. Thanks anyway, so speaks rohith. 19:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

]

Thanks for your notice. I realize the danger in creating a controversial entry, but the posts have hit all of my Usenet groups, and people are just starting to notice because he's changed his style. Since the earliest version was copied from Notable Usenet personalities, I went back and edited that to reflect WP:BLP. If you can help in any other way besides deletion, thanks. MMetro (talk) 22:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

NOTICE FOR ADMINS

If anyone willing to tell me how to actually use Misplaced Pages properly, (I'm relatively inexpierienced with the project) then please drop me a line at my talk page, thanks.--Hammerandclaw (talk) 23:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)hammerandclaw

Thank you Dlohcierekim, dude, you've started me on my way!--Hammerandclaw (talk) 23:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)hammerandclaw

I'm glad. Dlohcierekim 23:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Anon Prod Removal

An anon has removed the prod from Carlos Redman claiming the references at the bottom of the article prov he is notable. Ridernyc (talk) 00:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Cool. They might just. Dlohcierekim 00:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed nearly unanimously with 46 support, 1 oppose, and 0 neutral. Thanks for supporting me!

-Djsasso (talk) 17:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

The whole DJ Derrida thing turned out to be a silly hoax (a rather funny one) so I deleted our previous conversation due to its irrelevency. I hope you understand this deletion and thanks for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ Derrida (talk • contribs) 17:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

Dear Deepfriedokra, Thank you for voting in my RfA, which closed successfully with 34 support, 2 oppose, and 0 neutral. I appreciate your support! I promise I will wield the mop wisely, and do my best to improve Misplaced Pages.

-- AKeen (talk) 15:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Dlohcierekim, I am still new here, and am possibly "out of sorts", and would like to thank you for your welcome and for pointing out my mistakes. You have helped me out lots! Writelydie (talk) 17:18, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

SOCK PUPPETEERING

I've been accused of being a sock puupet. I frankly do not see how this can be possible, since I have made almost no edits bar those to my user page/talk page, and have only just started up. The sock puppeteer in question seems to have over a hundred suspected accounts to his name, and he is not someone I am familiar with. Certainly, I find it hard to believe he really has so many aliases. Can someone please give me an explanation, my accuser, has left no trace on any of my pages, and I would lie to find him/her, and have my sock puppet status removed. Contact me on my talk page.--Hammerandclaw (talk) 23:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)hammerandclaw

Smile

NHRHS2010 (talk · contribs) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

NHRHS2010 Happy Holidays 23:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

..

RfA !vote

Any chance you could reconsider your vote on the TPH RfA again? I have no connection to him or any reason to canvass on his behalf, but I hate to see the RfA fail based on one or two opposes that push it over the edge numbers-wise. I think that controversy attaches to anyone who participates so actively in AfD discussions, and inevitably in a large number of decisions some will be found that folks can disagree with. Perhaps since you supported initially, you can reconsider again?

Thanks, 16:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

It seems it has been closed as unsucessful, ah well. Rudget. 17:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Yup. Bummer. Was a squeaker. 17:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Drat. Dlohcierekim 14:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which which passed nem. con. with 45 support, 0 oppose, and 0 neutral. Thank you for your support and all the kind words that were expressed. I will try to live up to the trust placed in me by the community. I now have my homework to do and then pass the Marigolds.

And thanks for taking the time to wend through my contributions. Cheers.

Kbthompson (talk) 16:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Machias, Maine

Thanks for the delete, but weren't you supposed to move the specified article as well, per {{db-move}}?--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 20:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

OHHHH! Good idea. Thanks. Dlohcierekim 20:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Hmm. I actually thought the requester would and someone did. Dlohcierekim 20:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I did. :-) I just wanted to call your attention to the implications of db-move. Thanks again!--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 20:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

A bit of help with some vandalism please

A bit of help with some vandalism pleaseWould you have a quick loook at Gladys the Swiss Dairy Cow's article - you'll see what I believe to be some vandalism. If you are willing, I'd be grateful if you would revert it. ~--James.lebinski (talk) 18:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Let's talk this over

Feel from to come on over to my talk page and I'll explain the Jim Downer thing. It's not "patent nonsense," and I think you are exhibiting a bit of an "itchy trigger finger" in your speedy deletion. I do not doubt that this article may very well be a candidate for deletion, but I believe there's no reason there should be no dialogue, especially since you've ignored my initial response on both occasions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexmce (talk • contribs) 05:39, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

my reply. Dlohcierekim 05:45, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Woops

Sorry about the formatting confusion on WP:AIV. BTW, I decided to block that one because the identical vandalism was repeated over several days implying that it was not a shared IP. I block quick and hard under such circumstances. No reason not to when you're pretty sure who you are blocking. —Wknight94 (talk) 16:36, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

LOL No longer sure which one we're talking about. My comments floated up the page as vandal reports came off. I agree-- if it's vandalism only, block 'em. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 16:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

That BOT...

...is unbelievably annoying. The uzer supposedly added me to its whitelist, but it refuses to respond to it and randomly decides that I'm "vandalising" or "SPAMming" and reverts me. I duked it out with it on Reform mathematics as far as I could without getting blocked for edit warring. I'd dearly love to have the thing blocked untill it answers to its configuration. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 17:50, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Germany battle

I feel that it could be useful information. Thats why I didn't tag it for deletion in the first place. Bottom line is its history, and someone may need some information on it one day. Like I said, I didn't create the page, and I feel that in its current state, sure it should be deleted, but if its expanded and more useful info is added, then it should stay. Dustihowe  Talk  18:41, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Are you seriously going to go there? I mean, come on.... Dustihowe  Talk  18:50, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Why not go ahead and undelete it, add an expand and cleanup template to it, and see how the user changes it, if no changes are made, then lets go ahead and delete it. Give it a chance and see what happens. Dustihowe  Talk  18:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Whatever, if your going to continue to be disrespectful, then I am going to completley ignore you. You really don't deserve the power that you have been awarded if your going to disrecpect users and their opinions and beliefs. Dustihowe  Talk  19:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

If you feel that the article should be deleted, then go ahead and delete it. After revewing the page, I somewhat agree with you :-) Dustihowe  Talk  19:25, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which closed unsuccessfully with 25 support, 18 oppose, and 6 neutral. Thanks for the support and I'll look forward working with you. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 06:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which which passed with 40 support, 9 oppose, and 6 neutral. Thanks for your support. Alexf 02:38, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Deepfriedokra/20120823-20130831, I wish to tender my sincere thanks for your support in my successful request for adminship, which ended with 37 supports, 2 opposes, and 2 neutral. The results of the RfA are extremely bittersweet because of the recent departure of my nominator, Rudget. Hopefully I can live up to his and your expectations. I would especially like to thank Epbr123 and TomStar81 for mentioning that they were preparing to offer me a nomination. The past week has been one of the most stressful weeks in my life, and I appreciate your vote of confidence in me. If you ever need anything, just get in touch. -MBK₀₀₄ 21:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)