Revision as of 17:54, 2 February 2008 editBlue eyes gold dragon (talk | contribs)1,395 edits →Merge← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:00, 2 February 2008 edit undoTTN (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users58,138 edits ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::::before you even think about editing again look at ]--'''<small>]]</small>''' 17:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC) | ::::before you even think about editing again look at ]--'''<small>]]</small>''' 17:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::::No, they are not notable, and plenty of people are already angry at me anyways. There is nothing pointy about trying to get some articles that fail core policies and guidelines merged. Though, something pointy would be removing some merge tags that I don't agree with. ] (]) 17:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC) | :::::No, they are not notable, and plenty of people are already angry at me anyways. There is nothing pointy about trying to get some articles that fail core policies and guidelines merged. Though, something pointy would be removing some merge tags that I don't agree with. ] (]) 17:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::::dont be a fag, i removed them because you are merging ash into here--'''<small>]]</small>''' 17:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC) | ::::::dont be a fag, i removed them because you are merging ash into here--'''<small>]]</small>''' 17:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::::::Ash does not assert notability, so he belongs here. ] (]) 18:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:00, 2 February 2008
Merge
The characters do not require separate coverage. This list will cover each important character and the more important Pokémon. The hundreds of minor characters will be covered within the episode summaries on the lists, and the minor Pokémon will be covered on the Pokémon lists. TTN (talk) 14:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- WTF dawn is a main character just like misty, brock, and may. and team rocket doesnt need to be merged, it has enough to stand on it own -_- --Blue-EyesGold Dragon 16:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- OMFG you have got to be kidding -_- you want to merge people that have been in over 250+ episodes? and one person who has been in every season except the second?--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 16:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- I suggest that you read over WP:N. "It's a main character" and "It's been in hundreds of episodes" are not indicators of notability. They don't have real world information, so they need to be merged. TTN (talk) 16:49, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- you are going to get a lot of people that hate you for doing this. misty, may, dawn are notable--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 17:39, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- before you even think about editing again look at WP:POINT--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 17:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- No, they are not notable, and plenty of people are already angry at me anyways. There is nothing pointy about trying to get some articles that fail core policies and guidelines merged. Though, something pointy would be removing some merge tags that I don't agree with. TTN (talk) 17:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- dont be a fag, i removed them because you are merging ash into here--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 17:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Ash does not assert notability, so he belongs here. TTN (talk) 18:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- dont be a fag, i removed them because you are merging ash into here--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 17:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- No, they are not notable, and plenty of people are already angry at me anyways. There is nothing pointy about trying to get some articles that fail core policies and guidelines merged. Though, something pointy would be removing some merge tags that I don't agree with. TTN (talk) 17:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- I suggest that you read over WP:N. "It's a main character" and "It's been in hundreds of episodes" are not indicators of notability. They don't have real world information, so they need to be merged. TTN (talk) 16:49, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- OMFG you have got to be kidding -_- you want to merge people that have been in over 250+ episodes? and one person who has been in every season except the second?--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 16:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC)