Revision as of 01:31, 5 February 2008 view source72.76.93.83 (talk) →Hey David, tell us...: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:33, 5 February 2008 view source SineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,317 editsm Signing comment by 72.76.93.83 - "→Hey David, tell us...: new section"Next edit → | ||
Line 134: | Line 134: | ||
== Hey David, tell us... == | == Hey David, tell us... == | ||
Are you taking it up the ass from Michael Lucas? Is that why you made those contentious edits everybody's talking about? Oh honey, say it isn't so! | Are you taking it up the ass from Michael Lucas? Is that why you made those contentious edits everybody's talking about? Oh honey, say it isn't so! <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 01:31, 5 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 01:33, 5 February 2008
Click here to leave me a message
Mau
i didnt know most of the photos im always looking in the internet are yours! saludos! desde argentina —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guoma (talk • contribs) 16:35, 14 January 2008 (UTC) Glad you enjoy them. Thanks for the message. Dave David Shankbone 16:44, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
?
Why do you only have one of the male and not the female body? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.192.252.204 (talk) 01:04, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Because no woman would answer my Craigslist ad. --David Shankbone 01:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Caption help
Hey David, Could you please take a whack at rewriting the caption on your photo at Cross-dressing#The_problem_of_attributing_motives_for_cross-dressing? The current caption seems to imply that the rather oddly dressed cross--dresser came into an unfortunate state because of his cross-dressing when, in fact, we probably can't infer that. Benjiboi 11:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- I think it's perfectly written. I don't read what you read at all, and in fact, I think it makes it clear that motives are difficult to ascertain--the person could be a street performer, or whatever. I don't think it needs to be re-written. --David Shankbone 14:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Dead Sea
Hi. I removed the wp:Israel box because it is actually already there under the collapsed set of wikiprojects entitled: This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. --Flymeoutofhere (talk) 20:58, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Leaving my job
Heaven help me if I'm working for Condi Rice! "Nick" is a pseudonym. BTW, if you want to see a bit of my writing under my real name, you can check out my contributions to www.marlenadelacroix. com - the current story is mine. NickBurns (talk) 04:21, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered sometime in January 2008 (UTC). SatyrBot (talk) 23:24, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
wlo
Who is this model of the body answer me in my msn hormigonio_1117@hotmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.42.43.150 (talk) 15:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- He does not want to be named. --David Shankbone 02:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Congrats
The Photographer's Barnstar | ||
Congratulations for winning Wikinews' 2007 Picture of the Year! Thank you for contributing your talent to Misplaced Pages and its sister sites! - ✰ALLSTAR✰ 12:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
Arthur B. Kramer
has died. I know you've been working on brother Larry, so it occurred to me you may want to write a stub for Arthur. I'll pitch in. -- Y not be working? 20:12, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- I always felt I should have asked Larry to set up a photo shoot with Arthur. I'll work on a stub, but I have to get my Billy West interview posted first. --David Shankbone 20:18, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
NYC Subway
Hey, how is my picture poor, your picture has been up for a while now, and if you want, maybe you can take another picture of 36st, by the way, I go to school in Brooklyn and go home on the D train to Manhattan, so i will take another pic, K. NimiTize 01:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- First, it looks like you took it with a camera phone. It's colors are cold, and the light bleeds into the photo. Second, my photo shows life in the subway station, yours does not. Mine is a 2.13 MB colored photo, yours is a camera-phone shot that is 33KB in size. That's nothing. This isn't about "who gets to have their photo up" this is about the best shot on the page as possible. Hence, when my Sean Combs photo was trumped (arguably not) I did not revert to have mine in the lead. Your photo of this subway station, however, is clearly of far poorer quality. The media that wins out on this site is 1. high quality; and 2. something other people (say, a news outlet) can use. Your photo is neither based upon quality and size. --David Shankbone 01:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Fine, I will revert my own edit, and let you off with a warning, but I am going to take a new picture, and it will be better, if you say about my color is not good enough, but my camera is a 2.00 MB colored photo, so dont talk about color. Cool, NimiTize 02:39, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Great! If you take a better picture - more power to you dude! I illustrate over 3,000 articles on here - this one means nothing to me. It's the principle that a crappy 33KB camera phone shot doesn't trump the high-res quality one I put up. Once you take a photo that does - the page is all yours - trust me. You can have it man. As long as you improve it. --David Shankbone 02:52, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Fine, I will revert my own edit, and let you off with a warning, but I am going to take a new picture, and it will be better, if you say about my color is not good enough, but my camera is a 2.00 MB colored photo, so dont talk about color. Cool, NimiTize 02:39, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Upside-down glass mousetrap
Dude, it works and I used it. Lots of things are "Kind of ridiculous".
Augusten Burroughs
David I reverting your removal of the audio link. It doesn't look like spam to me, it appears to be an interview with the writer himself. I checked the talk page and you didn't leave any comments to clarify your reasoning. Thanks. Have a great day. Wjhonson (talk) 00:55, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- If you look at who added it, they added interviews for every person they ever spoke with. I don't particularly care, but I did a wholesale revert. I personally feel that if we are going to link to interviews, they should either 1. be notable; 2. be particularly illuminating; or 3. conducted with Wikinews. The third is self-serving, but Wikinews interviews are conducted with our own interests (the person's Misplaced Pages page) in mind. I won't revert you and I don't have any particular animus with this interview, but when I see someone adding links wholesale to Misplaced Pages, I usually do a wholesale revert. --David Shankbone 00:58, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think we can assume that the person adding the links has any conflict-of-interest as being related to the website. It's possible that, even though unrelated to the site, they just think the links might be useful. Personally I think an hour-long interview with Burroughs is very useful. If you find out that the person is actually associated with the website in some way and is trying to advertise it that would be a different story. We don't have any policy that would cover someone not associated with an interview site adding the links. Thanks David! Wjhonson (talk) 08:51, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Then the question comes to: Burroughs has probably done about 50-100 interviews of varying lengths. Which ones do we use? WP:Linkspam is a guideline that is applicable here, and it's quite common that when an WP:SPA is doing nothing but adding the work of one site to every page possible, they get reverted. --David Shankbone 15:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think we can assume that the person adding the links has any conflict-of-interest as being related to the website. It's possible that, even though unrelated to the site, they just think the links might be useful. Personally I think an hour-long interview with Burroughs is very useful. If you find out that the person is actually associated with the website in some way and is trying to advertise it that would be a different story. We don't have any policy that would cover someone not associated with an interview site adding the links. Thanks David! Wjhonson (talk) 08:51, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
I didn't realize how complicated adding information to this site is. I really just came across these interviews and thought they would be great for the site. They are notable, illuminating and very flattering to the authors wikipedia page. I'll get used to things and slowly contribute where I see a nice fit. David, if you get the chance you should listen to some of the interviews. They're good for any writer/artist to hear.Corkyshag (talk) 18:26, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
New user...questions
Hi David,
I tried to add some valuable links to Misplaced Pages today. I'm just trying to get the hang of the website. The links I had posted up are 1 hr interviews with best selling authors. Victoria Lautman has a series that she hosts at the LookingGlass Theatre in Chicago called Writers on the Record. I think these link are invalualbe to the site and to people looking for more information on the authors. Let me know what I need to do to get them posted. I am not a spammer. thank you for your help. Corkyshag (talk) 01:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.184.196.96 (talk) 01:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
PICTURES
Do you have pictures of pubic hair and the penis. (For wikipedia page)
WikiProject Films January 2008 Newsletter
The January 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have any suggestions for improvement or desire other topics to be covered, please leave a message on the talk page of one of the editors.Thank you. Nehrams2020 (talk) 01:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Your name has been mentioned at the Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard
Hello David. You are welcome to join the discussion and add your own comments there. EdJohnston (talk) 17:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey David, tell us...
Are you taking it up the ass from Michael Lucas? Is that why you made those contentious edits everybody's talking about? Oh honey, say it isn't so! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.76.93.83 (talk) 01:31, 5 February 2008 (UTC)