Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:23, 5 February 2008

• To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
• If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Important items to note:

• The new username that you choose must comply with Misplaced Pages's username policy.
• The new username you choose cannot already be taken and used by another account. You can search here to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns, "There is no global account for ", that means it is available.

Appeals: If your username is not in violation of Misplaced Pages's username policy, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Goodness Gracious Me!

Who would have been thinking that I am being blocked just for adding one factual information to a page. The premies must be enjoying lots and lots of power here, may the names of all the Holy Ones be praised. Thanking you for taking me towards humility. Prem Rawat (talk) 14:24, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

I am failing to understand why my name, Prem Rawat is being considered here as rude or inflammatory. indeed there is an article in wikipedia with this name and nowhere in that article is there anything slightly even to make indication that the name is rude. Am humbly very sorry to all readers if you are finding my name rude. Please not to hold it against me. 147.114.226.174 (talk) 14:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

I am not knowing who this anonymous user is being. The Prem Rawat article is, you are being right, not in any way critical of my namesake, which is being interesting to scholars from Mumbai. This is because usually many criticisms appear in articles here for providing balance and what in wikipedia is being called NPOV. Prem Rawat (talk) 15:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Now I am being told that I am making laughing people. "Watch out!" someone is telling me. I am being warned that holy people are not laughing people. Am humbly very sorry if any of you is thinking I am making you laughing. Am a scholar interested in knowledge and truth and how people are finding spiritual promises attractive but are sometimes not finding those promises kept. Am wanting to know how people are being hooked like a fish to an idea and then making big sacrifices to keep idea alive even if facts do not always support the idea. This is very interesting and a big root of devotionalism and conversely of chicanery. See I am watching American film to improve my Queen's English! Is easiest to gather material for my thesis here with linkings below. Prem Rawat (talk) 16:19, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Register with a new name

Just register with a new user name, and you are most welcome to contribute. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 16:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the advice. Will happily take on new name, but since new to doings here, and not understanding the rudeness of this name with no reason given for that rudeness, am not being clear about what is good name. Am from good family Rawat in Mumbai, always called Prem as a child, could I be P Rawat or just Prem? Prem Rawat (talk)

Making a List

In my humility I am being only allowed to place material here. This is very good, may the names of all the holy Ones be praised. I can here be making list of links to places in wikipedia where good information has been removed but is remaining available in histories. Such is the munificence of wikipedia in preserving everyone's contributions.

• the only addition that I was allowed to make by the all-powerful holy admin, acting on behalf of the Lord of the Universe I am bemusing: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Teachings_of_Prem_Rawat&diff=prev&oldid=189026533

• Oh dearie me! There have been criticism written here: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Prem_Rawat&diff=188851956&oldid=188801120#Criticisms_of_Prem_Rawat

to be continued by you if you like or Prem Rawat (talk) 14:33, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

You are most welcome to explore the discussion archives in which these issues have been discussed and addressed. The archives are available at the top of the talk page of these articles. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 16:54, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Am not finding archives mentioned. Perhaps these have been deleted by holy unlaughing people not wishing discussions to remain. Is it addressed why criticism is always removed from Prem Rawat page, why linking to antagonist ex-Premies site to provide balance is also removed, why link to how Knowledge can be proven by possession of pretty id card costing maybe plenty is not being allowed and is being called vandalism? Is the Prem Rawat organisation being thought an organisation of vandalism hereabouts? I am finding this hard to understand. Prem Rawat (talk) 17:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)