| Revision as of 12:30, 6 February 2008 editCIreland (talk | contribs)Administrators19,680 edits →Plovdiv link: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:38, 6 February 2008 edit undoCIreland (talk | contribs)Administrators19,680 edits →Plovdiv link: Re: continued edit warringNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| Whilst neither you nor {{user|ILike2BeAnonymous}} has technically violated the 3-revert-rule, there is no doubt that both you and ILike2BeAnonymous are edit warring over the external link at ]. The history of the last 100 edits: is unacceptable and other editors are complaining about the disruption this is causing. For now, I am simply asking you and ILike2BeAnonymous to cease edit warring at the article and to try to find either compromise or consensus on the talk page. ] (]) 12:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | Whilst neither you nor {{user|ILike2BeAnonymous}} has technically violated the 3-revert-rule, there is no doubt that both you and ILike2BeAnonymous are edit warring over the external link at ]. The history of the last 100 edits: is unacceptable and other editors are complaining about the disruption this is causing. For now, I am simply asking you and ILike2BeAnonymous to cease edit warring at the article and to try to find either compromise or consensus on the talk page. ] (]) 12:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| I asked you earlier today to cease edit warring over the external link at ]. However, you have continued to edit war at the article: . This is not an effective way to resolve the dispute and is highly disruptive. For this reason, if you do not cease edit warring, I will block you per ] and ]. ] (]) 14:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:38, 6 February 2008
Repeated removal of link in Plovdiv article
You can't just remove stuff, such as the link you keep taking out of that article, without one word of explanation in your edit summaries.
By the way, it looks like you've stepped over the three-revert rule line here. +ILike2BeAnonymous (talk) 01:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 13:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did to Plovdiv, you will be blocked from editing. CoJaBo (talk) 21:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Arbitration
I have requested arbitration in regards to the link Plovdiv - Granada of the east due to its constant removal and inclusion by different parties. As you are included in this process I would like it if you could join in the arbitration process with your case at http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Plovdiv#External_Link_-_Plovdiv_-_Granada_of_the_East http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Plovdiv#Clean_up_External_Links
Many thanks Koal4e 00:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Plovdiv
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Plovdiv. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.
Hi Avidius, I agree with you and dont like the Plovdiv - granada of the East link at all but would rather fight the inclusion of the link through the avenue I have taken so that we dont end up with you losing your account. I love Plovdiv and travel their regularly as my wife is from Plovdiv and her family still live there.
I am hoping that we can get agreement from other Misplaced Pages users that the link should not be included for its bias and innaccurate information, only time will tell though.
Please understand I support you in regards to this link. Thanks. --koal4e (talk) 22:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Plovdiv link
Whilst neither you nor ILike2BeAnonymous (talk · contribs) has technically violated the 3-revert-rule, there is no doubt that both you and ILike2BeAnonymous are edit warring over the external link at Plovdiv. The history of the last 100 edits: is unacceptable and other editors are complaining about the disruption this is causing. For now, I am simply asking you and ILike2BeAnonymous to cease edit warring at the article and to try to find either compromise or consensus on the talk page. CIreland (talk) 12:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I asked you earlier today to cease edit warring over the external link at Plovdiv. However, you have continued to edit war at the article: . This is not an effective way to resolve the dispute and is highly disruptive. For this reason, if you do not cease edit warring, I will block you per WP:EDITWAR and WP:BLOCK. CIreland (talk) 14:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC)