| Revision as of 07:26, 7 February 2008 editBackin72 (talk | contribs)5,347 edits →WP:POVFORK: h is for heh← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:29, 7 February 2008 edit undoValjean (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers95,301 edits Undid revision 189516227 by ScienceApologist (talk) A focused and unrelated discussionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{talk page}} | {{talk page}} | ||
| {{Homeopathy/Warning}} | |||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
| ''A point of view (POV) fork is a content fork deliberately created to avoid neutral point of view guidelines.'' Let's make sure that this article doesn't become that. -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 01:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | ''A point of view (POV) fork is a content fork deliberately created to avoid neutral point of view guidelines.'' Let's make sure that this article doesn't become that. -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 01:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| : Good point. If that happens, I'll support a AfD. I have also removed the homeopathy article probation template because no one is discussing homeopathy here. If that happens, it can be replaced. -- <i><b><font color="004000">]</font></b></i> / <b><font color="990099" size="1">]</font></b> 04:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | : Good point. If that happens, I'll support a AfD. I have also removed the homeopathy article probation template because no one is discussing homeopathy here. If that happens, it can be replaced. -- <i><b><font color="004000">]</font></b></i> / <b><font color="990099" size="1">]</font></b> 04:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Whoops, you just mentioned the H-word. Everybody get out their ban-sticks! ;-) --] (]) 07:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC) | ::Whoops, you just mentioned the H-word. Everybody get out their ban-sticks! ;-) --] (]) 07:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::: Removed the template for the same reasons. It is not a template for any and all alterntive medicine articles, but only those where homeopathy is being discussed or edited. That's not the case here. This is a focused and unrelated discussion. -- <i><b><font color="004000">]</font></b></i> / <b><font color="990099" size="1">]</font></b> 07:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:29, 7 February 2008
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chiropractic controversy and criticism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: Index, 1, 2 |
WP:POVFORK
A point of view (POV) fork is a content fork deliberately created to avoid neutral point of view guidelines. Let's make sure that this article doesn't become that. -- Levine2112 01:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Good point. If that happens, I'll support a AfD. I have also removed the homeopathy article probation template because no one is discussing homeopathy here. If that happens, it can be replaced. -- Fyslee / talk 04:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Whoops, you just mentioned the H-word. Everybody get out their ban-sticks! ;-) --Jim Butler (t) 07:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- Removed the template for the same reasons. It is not a template for any and all alterntive medicine articles, but only those where homeopathy is being discussed or edited. That's not the case here. This is a focused and unrelated discussion. -- Fyslee / talk 07:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)