| Revision as of 11:48, 9 February 2008 edit156.34.213.177 (talk) think encyclopedia - not grade 5 book report← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:34, 9 February 2008 edit undoACushen (talk | contribs)59 edits →Rolling Stones revert: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| Stop re-formating templates. Your version is no different than mine other than the fact that it is a different color. Also, your version is not the standard musical artist template either. The difference between your template version and mine is a personal preference. ] (]) 04:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC) | Stop re-formating templates. Your version is no different than mine other than the fact that it is a different color. Also, your version is not the standard musical artist template either. The difference between your template version and mine is a personal preference. ] (]) 04:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Templates are not black. Only 11 year "metal stereotypes" make them that colour. Look at other Rock templates to see which colours are standard use. Then do Misplaced Pages a favour and go around and change all the templates that aren't the right colour so that they all look the same. Even better.... change them into the newer navbox format that uses the 'field 1', 'field 2' etc structure. Leave the black backgrounds for the amateur fansites and schoolboy book reports. This is an encyclopedia. ] (]) 11:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC) | :Templates are not black. Only 11 year "metal stereotypes" make them that colour. Look at other Rock templates to see which colours are standard use. Then do Misplaced Pages a favour and go around and change all the templates that aren't the right colour so that they all look the same. Even better.... change them into the newer navbox format that uses the 'field 1', 'field 2' etc structure. Leave the black backgrounds for the amateur fansites and schoolboy book reports. This is an encyclopedia. ] (]) 11:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Rolling Stones revert == | |||
| Hey- | |||
| I'm new to all this diff'ing & History stuff, but it appears that you reverted my "Rhythm & Blues" edit back to "ryhthm and blues", for WP:ATT, on the Rolling Stones page? | |||
| If so, why not add a fact tag, to give me a chance to find a cite, rather than just removing my edit? That's kinda rude... | |||
| ] (]) 18:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:34, 9 February 2008
Sorry about that dude
Dream Theater rocks : ) Wisdom89 (talk) 02:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Templates
Stop re-formating templates. Your version is no different than mine other than the fact that it is a different color. Also, your version is not the standard musical artist template either. The difference between your template version and mine is a personal preference. Undeath (talk) 04:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Templates are not black. Only 11 year "metal stereotypes" make them that colour. Look at other Rock templates to see which colours are standard use. Then do Misplaced Pages a favour and go around and change all the templates that aren't the right colour so that they all look the same. Even better.... change them into the newer navbox format that uses the 'field 1', 'field 2' etc structure. Leave the black backgrounds for the amateur fansites and schoolboy book reports. This is an encyclopedia. 156.34.213.177 (talk) 11:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Rolling Stones revert
Hey-
I'm new to all this diff'ing & History stuff, but it appears that you reverted my "Rhythm & Blues" edit back to "ryhthm and blues", for WP:ATT, on the Rolling Stones page?
If so, why not add a fact tag, to give me a chance to find a cite, rather than just removing my edit? That's kinda rude...