Misplaced Pages

User talk:156.34.213.177: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:34, 9 February 2008 editACushen (talk | contribs)59 edits Rolling Stones revert: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 22:47, 9 February 2008 edit undoIxfd64 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators69,866 edits Message re. Vampires (song)Next edit →
Line 17: Line 17:


] (]) 18:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC) ] (]) 18:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

== February 2008 ==

] Hi, the <span class="plainlinks"></span> you made to ] has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the ] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative ]. You may also wish to read the ]. Thanks. <!-- Template:uw-huggle1 --> ] (]) 22:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:47, 9 February 2008

Sorry about that dude

Dream Theater rocks : ) Wisdom89 (talk) 02:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Templates

Stop re-formating templates. Your version is no different than mine other than the fact that it is a different color. Also, your version is not the standard musical artist template either. The difference between your template version and mine is a personal preference. Undeath (talk) 04:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Templates are not black. Only 11 year "metal stereotypes" make them that colour. Look at other Rock templates to see which colours are standard use. Then do Misplaced Pages a favour and go around and change all the templates that aren't the right colour so that they all look the same. Even better.... change them into the newer navbox format that uses the 'field 1', 'field 2' etc structure. Leave the black backgrounds for the amateur fansites and schoolboy book reports. This is an encyclopedia. 156.34.213.177 (talk) 11:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Rolling Stones revert

Hey-

I'm new to all this diff'ing & History stuff, but it appears that you reverted my "Rhythm & Blues" edit back to "ryhthm and blues", for WP:ATT, on the Rolling Stones page?

If so, why not add a fact tag, to give me a chance to find a cite, rather than just removing my edit? That's kinda rude...

ACushen (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Vampires (song) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)